MOVIE REVIEW

Clash of the Titans 3D

Clash of the Titans 3D
  • Clash of the Titans 3D details
    • Clash of the Titans 3D details
  • images and posters
    • Clash of the Titans 3D images
  • Clash of the Titans 3D news
    • Clash of the Titans 3D news
  • Clash of the Titans 3D review
Clash of the Titans 3D Clash of the Titansí special effects feel as dated as those in the movie itís remaking. That might sound like a good thing if youíre nostalgic for the now classic, Ray Harrhuasen movie, but itís not. Though they look generally ridiculous now, back in 1981 Clash of the Titansí stop-motion special effects were groundbreaking. They had to be, because there wasnít much of a story. This new version throws a lot of CGI at the screen, but hasnít done much to improve either those now clunky special effects or the filmís even clunkier story. The result is an action adventure movie with questionable action and a useless plot. Itís laughable at worst and a boring at best.

It starts out promisingly. Thereís a great little intro in which a narrator tells us the story of Greekís gods, re-enacted by constellations whizzing by the camera in three dimensions. Itís a nice exposition, and if the movie had stopped there they might have been on to something. But then thereís another exposition in which Sam Worthington tries and fails to convincingly play the son of a fisherman. Sorry Sam, I donít buy the weak-willed peasant thing. Even wearing a potato sack, you look ready to kill something. Thatís why weíre here isnít it? Like the original, Clash of the Titans is pure, special effects, slay the monster escapism. Forget the story, letís get to the monsters.

The monsters take awhile to show up but we meet the Gods right at the outset. Liam Neeson makes a passable Zeus though Ralph Fiennes makes a strangely unscary Hades. Both gods are less about the performances of actors than the special effects used to make them glow or ooze about the screen. Those are largely successful, with Hades burning his way into existence like hot coals and Zeus zapping around on a lightning bolt. One day while hanging out on Olympus, Zeus comes up with maybe the worst plan in the history of theocracy. As near as I can tell it mainly involves letting Hades have all the tools to destroy him, and then waiting to see someone can stop the god of the underworld before he does it.

While the gods plot and scheme, Sam Worthingtonís Perseus arrives at a Greek city state warring with the Gods. Hades has promised to send the Kraken to destroy them and when the cityís panicked king discovers for no particular reason that Perseus is actually a demi-god (half man, half god) they latch on to him as their savior even though heís just a fisherman who has no idea what heís doing.

Rather than training him to fight, Perseus is sent on a journey to meet some witches, whom weíre told hold the key to defeating the Kraken. Really this is just an excuse to get Perseus out of the city and fighting a bunch of monsters. By then youíve sat through so much exposition that youíll be more than ready for some slaying.

Unfortunately, most of the monsters look terrible. To be fair, maybe these special effects didnít start out awful, they may only look bad because theyíve been post-processed into a 3D mess. Unlike movies such as Avatar where the film is shot in 3D from the start, or movies like Alice in Wonderland where 3D is planned from the beginning and added at the end, Clash of the Titans appears in 3D only as a last-minute, gimmicky, careless money grab. Spend ten minutes with those glasses on and itís obvious.

In the movieís better moments, those last-minute 3D effects are unnoticeable, except as what can only be properly described as a 3D haze which makes it harder to watch the movie. I walked out of Clash of the Titans exhausted, as if Iíd just fought the Kraken myself, after the struggle of squinting through it. I found relief only in the moments when I took off my uncomfortable 3D glasses to take a break. Weirdly, the movie was entirely watchable without the glasses, its 3D effects so slight that with or without eyewear it made little difference. And people are paying extra for this?

In the movieís worst moments, 3D turns everything into a series of bad, cardboard cutouts. Itís the backgrounds that really suffer, turned into the equivalent of hand-drawn matte paintings, or like something taken out of a 1998 videogame cut scene. The other effects in Clash of the Titans do little better. Medusa is one of the worst CGI creations Iíve seen since The Mummy Returns slapped The Rockís face on a scorpion. And speaking of scorpions, the movieís giant killer bugs might be kind of impressive if the fight scenes involving them were shot in a way that you could tell whatís going on. Yes, a lot of these big effects shots suck on their own, but the movieís miserable 3D makes them even worse.

In spite of its failings, itís hard not to have at least a little fun with Clash of the Titans. In spite of all the bad CGI, it does get a few things right. The Kraken, once it emerges from its watery hole, is every bit as impressive as youíd expect. Pegasus, though he makes almost no sense in the context of the story, looks fantastic. The soldiers who accompany Perseus are a series of played out stereotypes, but fun stereotypes, well acted by a group of gifted performers. Clash of the Titans makes no attempt to be anything other than a big, dumb action movie and thereís entertainment value in seeing something like that when itís done right. But too much of the time, Clash of the Titans gets it all wrong.

The thing is, we should have seen this coming. Didnít the people at Warner Bros. who hired him, see director Louis Letterrierís last film? It was called The Incredible Hulk and though it does many good things, the filmís biggest flaw is a computer-generated mess at the end which is every bit as bland and uninteresting as everything in Clash of the Titans only, imagine Hulkís CGI blather stretched out over 90 minutes. Incredible Hulk had complex story and characters to prop itself up on. Clash of the Titans does not.


Reviewed By:
4 / 10 stars
movie reviewed rating
comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
REVIEWS
FEATURES
FROM THE WEB
TOP MOVIES
HOT TOPICS