Film Hobbit
04-18-2002, 04:00 PM
I have just finished this, my first Phillip K. Dick novel.
First let me say that if his other writings are like this one, they really are ideally suited to filmmaking, which is perhaps why so many of his works have been turned into movies.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is the book upon which Blade Runner is based. The movie is a lot better. Mr. Dick is a terrible writer. He seems totally incapable of describing anything, and as such doesn't really seem to bother. You never get even enough information to build any kind of mental picture of the world or characters in his world. But not only is their physical appearance poorly described, he totally drops the ball on establishing spacial relationships, or explaing the MOTIVATION behind the things that make his world work.
It's all very disconnected and frequently just becomes down right fuzzy and lost. What's worse, is you're never really able to identify any of his characters, because he doesn't really bother to explain why they do the things they do, nor does he really adequetly explain these complex belief systems which seem to rule their lives.
I said it was ideally suited for filmmaking.... and it is. If only because Dick leaves so many details out, it leaves lots of room for filmmakers to fill their own in and develop their own vision from it. See, Dick has some really good ideas... he just can't flesh them out on his own. His book is really just the framework for an idea... a good idea that he doesn't know how to express.
Very dissapointing, and I doubt I'll ever read anything he writes again.
First let me say that if his other writings are like this one, they really are ideally suited to filmmaking, which is perhaps why so many of his works have been turned into movies.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is the book upon which Blade Runner is based. The movie is a lot better. Mr. Dick is a terrible writer. He seems totally incapable of describing anything, and as such doesn't really seem to bother. You never get even enough information to build any kind of mental picture of the world or characters in his world. But not only is their physical appearance poorly described, he totally drops the ball on establishing spacial relationships, or explaing the MOTIVATION behind the things that make his world work.
It's all very disconnected and frequently just becomes down right fuzzy and lost. What's worse, is you're never really able to identify any of his characters, because he doesn't really bother to explain why they do the things they do, nor does he really adequetly explain these complex belief systems which seem to rule their lives.
I said it was ideally suited for filmmaking.... and it is. If only because Dick leaves so many details out, it leaves lots of room for filmmakers to fill their own in and develop their own vision from it. See, Dick has some really good ideas... he just can't flesh them out on his own. His book is really just the framework for an idea... a good idea that he doesn't know how to express.
Very dissapointing, and I doubt I'll ever read anything he writes again.