movie reviews, movie news, dvd, and movie discussion
Reviews Upcoming Podcast Forums Video

Sony Buries PS3, While CB Games’ Prediction Comes True

By William Usher: 2007-04-18 08:40:21
Hyp on N4G
Sony Buries PS3, While CB Games’ Prediction Comes True You all thought Microsoft would have delivered the fatal blow to the head, but it was Sony who dealt the fatality that echoed throughout the video game industry. Shortly after our article about the PS3 dying, what does Sony go and do? They kill the PlayStation 3. It wasn’t without good reason, but it does make you question whether the PS3 is doing all that well, considering that both versions of the Xbox 360 survived through the first six months of release.

As you all know, the 60gig PS3 has not be touched; it is not harmed. However, some of you may have already read about the 20 gigabyte PlayStation 3 being nailed in a coffin and buried beneath the earth, never to rise again. And this came shortly after we predicted that the PS3 was dying. Posters, readers and fanboys vehemently denied that anything was wrong with the PS3, and yet Sony said otherwise with their actions.

Now what’s more is that the consumer demand for the 60gig model outweighed the 20gig model 10 to 1. Basically meaning that approximately – out of just under the 1.5 million units sold in the United States – only 142,000 units of the 20gig PS3 were preferred by consumers. Ouch!

Amazingly, people preferred the $600 unit over the $500 one. In this particular case I’m horribly convinced that price is no longer the PlayStation 3's down-dragging. With interest and demand from retailers hovering over the Xbox 360 Elite, which is only $20 away from what the 20gig PS3 used to be, one obviously can’t argue that 100 gigabyte in the Xbox 360 Elite is the $20 interest difference between the PlayStation 3 20 gigabyte model and the Xbox 360 Elite...can they?

Well, despite the oxymoron consumer demand for a product (i.e., paying $20 less for an Elite), we here at CB Games have always stuck to the simple philosophy that software sells hardware. And the only game for the PS3 that was within the top twenty sales charts for February was Resistance: Fall of Man. Again, OUCH!

Even with the 80 gig model on the way (and possibly without the Emotion Engine, if they want to further cut the costs), which in my opinion is the surefire way to compete with the X3E, Sony is somehow going to have to convince people that the PS3 is not dying. The PlayStation Home is something no gamer can deny as being cool, but how well will the Home cater toward third-party software support? And what game will make use of the Home’s avatar? I admit, it’s cool being able to create yourself...or Michael Jordan...or your Miss February biology teacher who always leans too close...yeah, you get my drift. But what good is that if Sony has yet to announce a game that makes use of that avatar? I can’t tell you how cool it would be to run around in GTA IV while playing as Jack Thompson!

Anyway, while a lot of fanboys have been defending Sony since the PS3's launch, a lot of people have recognized that while the PS3 has shifted more units than the Xbox 360 in the same period of last year, one system suffered from shortages up to and through March. Can you guess which system that is? No nevermind, I know how fanboys respond. It was the Xbox 360. Sony already had 1 million PS3's shipped to the US and Japan before the end of 2006. Yet they haven’t even sold 1 million in Japan and that’s where they’re supposed to be favored. Again, OUCH!

But still, Sony needs a software solution not a hardware solution. They NEED third-party exclusives from developers who can actually master the PS3's architecture. I don’t want to play Devil May Cry 4, Final Fantasy, Dark Sector, Army of Two, GTA IV or Assassin’s Creed on a $600 machine that looks and plays the same on a $400 machine. The hardware sales are reflecting the PS3's lacking, exclusive software appeal. Even according to early (shoddy) preview estimates by Wedbush, the PS3 is still down 100,000 units in a sales comparison to the Xbox 360. As much as gamers, fanboys, analysts and even myself, have used the excuse that the PS3 will be "future proof", and subsequently huge in another two or three years, the fore-mentioned games are coming out this year and early next year. So what reason do you really have to play GTA IV on the PS3 and not the Xbox 360? Or more importantly, why pay $200 more to play your favorite game?

Personally, I don’t think Sony is expecting people to wait until 2008 to buy the darn thing. But between that time the software (with the exception of MGS4, Lair and Heavenly Sword) isn’t looking particularly fancy. Now I’m not writing this to appeal to either side of the console war, I’m writing this because I’m a gamer just as much as the next reader over and I’d like to see what I could be playing on the PS3 six years from now. But that won’t happen if the system doesn't stay around long enough, or developers keep sharing the PS3's possible smash-hits with Xbox 360 and PC gamers.

Remember, mass consumers for a console will be gamers and no one else. Every so often techies or gadget gurus will pick up a latest and greatest video game console, but it’s the gamers who keep it alive. The 3DO, Saturn, Dreamcast, Sega Mars, Sega CD, Atari Jaguar and M2 were proof of that. Heck, two weeks before its release the M2 didn’t even make it to retailers. So if Sony doesn’t want to bury another PS3 model, they better find a way to make gamers feel like that $200 difference is worth it.



With the current axe given to the 20gig PS3, how important is it for Sony to change their gameplay for the PS3?

  Results



Tips N4G


Latest Headlines:

 

Comment on “Sony Buries PS3, While CB Games’ Prediction Comes True”

Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
  1. alec Says:

    Sony and Microsoft should team up with the ultimate, hardware and software. Beat Nintendo and have fanboys from both corners buying the ultimate games machine!

  1. Steve Says:

    Xbox 360 +
    seperately sold wifi adaptor +
    yearly subscription to xbox live +
    hdvd drive.

    This would not be $200 dollars less that a PS3 (most likely a fair bit more). But you need to add those if you want to compare apples to apples.

  1. 13LADE Says:

    There is a reason sony has buried the 20GB PS3, it wasn't selling enough and sony also realised that keeping it on would be a mistake, i think this is just a simple case of phasing out the lower model and making the 60GB PS3 the lower end and introducing a new model as the premium.

    Sony hasn't not changed their hardware specs like the xbox 360 did but merely increase are reported to be increasing their HDD and maybe adding in better bluetooth support if that letter circulating a few weeks ago is to be beleived. Don't be fooled into thinking the PS3 is not worth the money, it IS worth the money. I bought mine knowing although it didn't have any games to completely match gears of war for the 360, it WOULD definitly show it's true value to gamers alone by the end of 2007, mid 2008.

    I received my free copy of casino royale on blu-ray and after watching it, i JUST had to watch some more movies in HD and ended up ordering a further two. Blu-ray though isn't just for movies though and will come into it's own and show that it IS a needed component in the coming years as developers of exclusive first party of third party begin to fully exploit the the extra storage capacity it brings. Any of you thinking that the PS3 is not worth it obviously have not had enough hands on time and explored it's media capabilities fully or looked at it's future potential.

    MY advice is if you can afford only one and want the console with the best looking furture outlook and longevity then i BELEIVE the PS3 is surely the console for you and will definately show it's worth to you in the coming years down the line if it hasn't with it's already available games and blu-ray movie playback on any HD TV.

    I beleive that the xbox 360 elite is a poor attempt on microsofts part to try and play 'catch-up' now they know their current hardware wasn't able to compete. A great example of this is the HDMI port on the 'elite' which comes as standard on any of the PS3 configurations. A Microsoft employ was seen in a video interview openly stating that it was 'unncessary' and now they add it into their 'elite'. Sony certainly received a slating for the PS3 before it was released but it certainly will be praised in the years for it's 'future proofing' it gave the PS3 by games developers. Game storage space is surely gonna be a problem for the xboxb 360, i'm sure we will be seeing games on the PS3 in the years to come averaging twice the size of most xbox 360 titles. Even david jaffe will be grateful for that extra space blu-ray has when he starts to work on God of War 3 (the origonal GoW).

  1. Clement Says:

    I Hope you've written those articles to attract xbox fanboy and get some money from ads on your website.

    Because if you really believe what I am reading here, please go back to school and further your education man, please.

  1. CB Andrew Says:

    STEVE: I get what you're saying about comparing apples to apples, but I don't necessarily think its true. Sure the PS3 is a superior hardware when you count the wifi and bluray etc. but one of the reasons I personally like the 360 is because they let you choose which things you need. For example: I won't need wifi because my cable router is right next to my entertainment center. Similarly, it's silly to pay tons of extra cash for a HD-DVD drive when one does not have an HD TV. When the time comes and I do have one, I can choose to upgrade.

  1. DoomsDae Says:

    It’s interesting how Sony Fanboys love to think of the PS3 as “future proof.” New flash boys it’s no more future proof than your underwear are fire proof.

    1) Blu Ray is just another disk format. Is it better than HD DVD? No, the picture quality is the same. Don’t start on your rant about storage space, because when it comes to movies who cares. As for games, well lets just use a bit of common sense. Sure there is extra disk space for game data, now just who the hell do you think is going to spend the extra dev time and money to fill it? (Crickets sound paste here).
    2) Online game play. The PlayStation Store has a long way to go before it’s remotely close to Xbox Live. It’s funny you goofs always bring up the fact that you have to pay for live, but when you do the math, it’s $.96 cents a week. I would think since you thought dropping $600 bones you could do simple math.
    3) Price. Sure if you add all the features to an Xbox 360 it could cost as much if not more than a PS3. But that’s the point of the Xbox 360, you don’t have to buy all that junk. I’m in the telecom industry and I can tell you that putting WiFi in every box was a huge waste of money. Add to that the fact that Blu Ray isn’t really needed for gaming, but Sony wants everyone to buy into yet another disk format.
    4) Competition is everywhere. Blu Ray is competing with HD DVD and downloadable content. PS3 is competing with consoles that cost a lot less and are far more innovative than the PS3 (Wiimote, Live Anywhere etc…)

    After spending a week with the PS3 I came to this conclusion. It’s a nice HiDef DVD player that plays games. The online store is just sad, the controller feels cheap and I just can’t get past that George Forman Grill look. It’s a lot of really cool technology, but at the end of the day it felt incomplete, clumsy and over the top for a game device. Sony needs to remember that it’s the games that should come first and everything else is just nice fluff.

  1. tarugogogoghogog Says:

    mcrosoft looks stupid than i ever amagine

  1. ad Says:

    Some of your comments are relevent but how can you give yourself a pat on the back for being right when the actions of Sony actually implies you are wrong i.e. Sony are less concerned about the price of the PS3 then you claim. If you previous article is anything to go by then Sony should be more concerned about the high price of the PS3 and hence at least retain the cheaper 20GB model. Hence please don't give yourself too much credit because you didn't actually predict the future, far from it.

  1. Jeretron0 Says:

    you know whats funny?The Nintendos Gameboy Advanced a dying or already dead console out sold the PS3 in the month of april...........truely sad

Leave a Reply




Back to Sony Buries PS3, While CB Games’ Prediction Comes True

MAIN SITE NAVIGATION
HOME l ABOUT US l l SEARCH l MOVIE NEWS l MOVIE REVIEWS l MOVIE PREVIEWS l DVD REVIEWS l DVD NEWS l SOUNDTRACKS l FEATURES DATABASE l TELEVISION l MUSIC l GAMES l CELEBRITY l TECHNOLOGY l RSS 2.0 FEEDS l MESSAGE BOARDS l LIVE CHAT l SYNDICATE US l LINKS | CB STORE | MUNCH MONSTER


This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.

Made in Webta Labs
SITE SEARCH
SITE FEEDS


 

MORE FROM CB