Now, before you jump on my back and start punching me in the back of the head calling me a Beatles hater and all kinds of other terrible things that just aren’t true, hear me out first—I actually like the Beatles better than I like Led Zeppelin. I think the Beatles just had a more diverse vision of where music could be taken, and they definitely took it there. If you don’t believe me, just listen to all of the records between Please Please Me and Abbey Road to see what I mean.
But that doesn’t mean, however, that MTV, which recently made the announcement that a Beatles game was indeed being made, is going to show that magical mystery tour throughout their entire catalogue. As is often the case with these ultra popular music games, the songs that are going to be hand-picked for the game are most likely the most popular, endearing ones by the group. And with only 45 Beatles’ songs getting picked for the game, you can bet that some really awesome fan favorites (like “Dr. Roberts,” and “I Will” for me) might get short shrifted to make way for, “I Want To Hold Your Hand,” or “Come Together” - which are great songs but exactly what you’d expect from a game like this. I want the unexpected.
And that’s what I think I’d get with a Led Zeppelin game, as their guitar-heavy songs have a better chance of drifting among some of their lesser known hits in their catalogue. And this is because, quite frankly, Led Zep aren’t nearly as popular or beloved as the Beatles, and your mom won’t get upset if “All My Love” is on it, but “When the Levee Breaks,” isn’t. But she will get upset if she doesn’t get to croon, “Strawberry Fields,” even though that song is known less for its instrumentation and more for its surrealistic lyrics.
And that’s another reason why an all Zep game would be even cooler than an all Beatles game—Zeppelin songs just rock harder. Really, besides “Helter Skelter” by the Beatles, can you name a single other song by them that is actually all that hard? I’m not saying a game has to be all hard rock all the time, but if the tracks are mostly just sing-songy and poppy, then that’s going to get tiresome real fast. So a Beatles game, awesome. But an all Zeppelin game, even awesomer…er?
Comment on “Why An All Led Zeppelin Game Would Be Better Than An All Beatles Game”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
I agree with on the fact that a Led Zeppelin game would be much better than a Beatles game. But I am a huge Zeppelin fan and throughout the years what you've been able to count on from them is not commercializing their music and I'm glad that Page hasn't so far.
The thing I disagree with is the statement "I think the Beatles just had a more diverse vision of where music could be taken, and they definitely took it there." Obviously you haven't listened to all of Zeppelin's material. Listen to Achilles Last Stand then go listen to Tangerine or the Rain Song. The Beatles were very diverse but to say that they had a much more diverse vision than Zeppelin did is absurd.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
November 4, 2008 at 14:31