Box Office Oddity - The Saw Factor

By Scott Gwin: 2007-10-22 00:47:08

Lionsgate has got a real cash cow on its hands. No, I'm not talking about Tyler Perry, though he's earned the studio a pretty penny with his movies in recent years. I mean the Saw films. For no apparent reason other than the fact that they roll out at Halloween, the movies have become a staggering financial success. Despite growing arguably worse with each passing movie, they continue to rake in the money, severed hand over bloody fist. With Saw IV coming out right on cue next weekend, the question isn't how bad it's going to be, but how much money it's going to rake in anyway.

While the first movie was somewhat clever and original (a quality I value in any movie), many would argue that the Saw films started going downhill fast when the second movie rolled out (CB's Rafe Telsch disagrees, but I think he has a thing for Dina Meyer). Some say the third movie was where things turned sour, but people still turned out in droves to see it. At this point pretty much everyone (even horror fans) seem to have the lowest of expectations for Saw IV, but if history is any indication, the promise of a lousy movie isn't likely to keep audiences away.

Of course no one expects these movies to be works of art. They're horror movies. You don't go see them for the witty dialogue or brilliant acting. You to see them to watch people doing stupid, scary things in the hopes that you will be scared yourself. Still, at some point the stupid outweighs the scary and the franchise becomes a complete waste of time. It happened to all the greats: Nightmare On Elm Street, Friday the 13th and so on. Somewhere along the way the franchise goes from the good kind of bad to the bad kind of bad. And yet, even if you walked out of Saw II swearing you'd never spend another dime on those crappy Saw sequels, people can't seem to help themselves ( you're in good company, though, with CB's Mack Rawden).

Each movie has made more cash than the one before it. And since they're made on shoestring budgets they turn wild profits, almost guaranteeing that we'll be seeing Jigsaw in theaters for many Halloweens to come. Though the movies get progressively worse, more and more people go to see them. And it's not just in the U.S. It's a phenomenon that spans the globe. There's no denying it. The numbers don't lie. I've laid them out for you below. Behold them, one of the greatest mysteries of our time.

Saw

Released:
October, 2004

Budget:
$1.2 million

World-wide Box Office:
$103 million

Cinema Blend Review:

"Saw is not for everyone. It can be gruesome and brutal, if that’s your thing, but that makes up a very small part of what it otherwise an interesting psychological thriller. It’s not perfect; with a little less hamming from some of the leads and a little script tweaking it could have been an excellent movie."

Cinema Blend DVD Review:

"Saw was made on a micro budget, raked in millions at the box office, and is doing the same in DVD sales. The movie’s success can partly be credited to a rise in horror movie popularity as well as a clever publicity campaign. The enigmatic and ubiquitous posters for this movie made many people take notice, including me. Does Saw deserve all the attention it’s getting?"

Saw II

Released:
October, 2005

Budget:
$4 million

World-wide Box Office:
$147 million

Cinema Blend Review:

With a stronger story, sicker and more disturbing traps, and even better acting then the original, Saw II is one of those rare sequels that surpass the foundation it was built on. While the movie does, yet again, leave things open for a potential sequel, I hope Lion’s Gate won’t resort to pulling another chapter out. They’ve gotten the Saw concept right this time. There’s no need to delve further and possibly steer the franchise in the wrong direction."

Saw III

Released:
October, 2006

Budget:
$10 million

World-wide Box Office:
$164 million

Cinema Blend Review:

"Like a home video recorded by a five year-old who doesn’t know how to work the zoom, Saw III spins through its list of disemboweling traps with little concern for continuity or common sense."

Cinema Blend DVD Review:

"Saw III is packed with stock footage from the previous two Saws to the point where it seems less like an actual movie and more like a mad mix tape. The Bloody Best of Saw!Of course, most of what is shown is pointless filler."

Latest Headlines:

Trailer: Tobey Maguire And Jake Gyllenhaal Are Brothers

Even More Alice In Wonderland Images

Strange Patriotism: The American Flag's Weirdest Moments On Film

Inglourious Basterds Banners

View-Master: The Movie

Tony Stark's Iron Man 2 Race Car

Superman May Be Done With Brandon Routh

First Look At Eminem in Funny People

Public Enemies Poll: Tell Us What You Think

Jessica Biel In Thor?

Comment on “Box Office Oddity - The Saw Factor”

Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.

Subscribe to topic comments

0 0 / 0
y n

Aaron
October 22, 2007 at 13:09

Saw will continue to do good no matter how bad the story is because of the different twist & turns. People can't wait to see part 4 so they can find out what happened in the last movie. And it will be the same thing with part 5 as long as they continue there methods.

Reply

Subscribe to topic comments

Please login or sign up to post reply

Back to Box Office Oddity - The Saw Factor

Box Office Oddity - The Saw Factor

Comment on “Box Office Oddity - The Saw Factor”

Leave a Reply