Exclusive: Tom Hanks Confirmed For Da Vinci Code Sequel

Why Giselle...She has no acting experience.

1 of d bst buk i'hav ever red..!!

oh! lower dll,

I am happy to see tom hanks once again in the sequel of DVC. When I first saw the cover of DVC, my eyes told me there is something special with the content. I read and ofcourse watched the movie. To be honest, Whenever I read Langdon, Tom will be the first picture in my mind. Great to see him again in the sequel. And, I love tom hanks.

oh! lower dll.

Great to see Tom Hanks in the sequel of DVC. He is the one who perfectly matches the character 'Robert Langdon'.

i read that the da vinci code 2 should have the codename aladygma, is that true???

i am white not japenese i am just a fan of the show naruto or the sequal series shippuden i am in 7th grade but yall are being tto harsh

i am happy to hear angels and demon's shooting is progressing
waitin to see tom hanks back in the role of robert langdon.
it will b a gud movie.

Just wanted to add my two-penneth.

Gisele as vittoria??!! Oh come on people - surely that's a joke? Someone who has made a career of standing look vacant is who they want for the firey italian.??

Just proves Ron Howard doesn't have a scooby-do what he's doing with this project. I'm sure it will take loads of money and be hailed as a "success" but everyone really knows he's f**** up big time. LEAVE THE ACTION BLOCKBUSTERS TO SPIELBERG RON!! - STEP AWAY FROM THE BOOK!.

s
x

TDVC and A&D are both excellently written books, I hope the movie will do the book justice. I can't wait and see it when it comes out. Tom Hanks is a great Dr. Langdon, he can portray the character in a way that he is very intellectual and very captivating (not very pleasing to the eye though) but he is a very good actor, I would not any other actor to play him. He is worth every penny the producers paid him.

i loved both books i think tom hanks played a fitting character for langdon he had the face and attitude i imagned langdon would have while reading the da vinci code suprisingly to you all i am a 6th grader and yes i have read the book and angels and demons leonardo da vinci is my idol even though he was homosexual.... thats why i was embaressed to say my idol was a gay guy.......but if it werent for him we wouldnt have helicopters or for instance a number 1 all time selling book the da vinci code hahaha(laughs)

I agree with Joel...Angels & Demons just seems like overall it will be a much more entertaining movie. Though as much as I absolutly love TDVC and the movie, what makes the book good and interesting is all the historical background and whatnot, a lot of which had to be left out of the movie. But too much couldn't be left out, and there was too much thinking and not enough action. For Angels & Demons, they can take out some of the historical aspect, but still be left with a lot of the thrill and action that is left behind. You know all the crazy people will come out of the woodwork about how "anti matter" couldn't possibly be used that way..and the illuminati and freemasons are not related...but hey...controversy is what makes us all anticipate it, and anticipate what Brown is gonna write for the third book.

They didn't exactly do justice to the DaVinci code either, but if you read both books you see angels and demons making a better movie, it's got all the elements right there, this one whould be better I think. Then again what movie does justice to it's beek, tha the beauty about books. Go into it like I did the Davinci code, picture Ron Howard with a chain saw and the book infront of him and then you know what to expect. It's going to be a great movie.

Hey great to see Tom back with his new role!!!!! I am sure the movie will be a big hit just like Da Vinci. I hope that someone goo portrays the character of Vittoria Vetra!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, when I watched the first part I honeslty can't say that I've taken all that seriously. I've completely taken it as a fictional movie, as the facts can always be shown in a stranger way that suits us.

I think the writer of this artical never read the books. I was LIVID when they cast Tom Hanks as Langdon. In the book Langdon is hot. Tom Hanks was completely WRONG for the part. The books are good partly because Langdon is a great character. I know I'm not the only one in my demographic (20-35 female) who was pissed at the choice. I was hoping it was a mistake the producers would correct in A&D but no they have &*^% up again.

Wonder how they think they're gonna shoot throughout Rome and Vatican City. The Westminster Abbey scenes were the worst part of TDVC and I hate to think what a fake St. Peter's Square is going to look like.

A&D is a prequel to what happens in TDVC. However, there is no really direct connection from one to the next when it comes to plot. There is no reason it can't be filmed as happening afterwards TDVC.

And actually, I just read the book yesterday, and the Pope is dead in the story.

Like Martin says... Angels and Demons was written before Da Vinci Code... but hey I guess its okay to screw up the time line

I can't imagine them being able to do justice to Angels & Demons on screen, I loved the book.

Just to be correct. Angel and demon happen before Da'Vinci Code.