We’ve been hearing for months now about Marvel’s superhero master plan, in which they’ll make a series of solo movies featuring their characters, and then bring them all together in one big, Avengers movie. That means Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America, Thor… everyone all in one awesome, big team-up. Unfortunately, it looks like if Hulk is invited to join the Avengers, his puny pal Bruce Banner may not be played by Edward Norton.
MTV says that Norton told them that he hasn’t gotten any indication from Marvel Studios that they’ll want him back. He says, “I don’t have any idea what they want to do.” According to Norton, he’s in the dark about everything which might involve the future of his character.
It’s odd that Norton would be so out of the loop, especially if you consider that whenever Robert Downey Jr. is interviewed, he talks as if he’s already seen Marvel’s master plan for Tony Stark, and is intimately involved in it. Of course The Incredible Hulk was nowhere near the box office hit that Iron Man was, making even less than the Ang Lee version which it was supposed to supplant. That could be the problem. Or it could be those old rumors of infighting between Ed Norton and Marvel. Norton wanted something more cerebral, Marvel wanted Hulk smashing stuff… and got what they wanted in spite of Norton’s rumored protestations.
Could Marvel be holding a grudge? Or perhaps they’re simply done with the Hulk. He’s had two chances now and achieved only mixed success both with critics and at the box office. Maybe the Avengers will assemble without him.
Comment on “Marvel May Not Want Ed Norton Back As Hulk”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
Good, the Avengers shouldn't have Hulk in it anyway. That would be the NEW Avengers, which would totally wipe the slate of the old Avengers--Hawkeye, Vision, Captain America, Ironman, and Antman.
Hulk is still cool and Nortons Banner was really good, though it did feel like it was missing something, that is until the end when Hulk FINALLY got to face a worthy foe (it took two movies to get there).
I think what Hulk was lacking was that he was and is a Hero, and it wasnt until he got to face a bad guy that we see that hes not out to hurt anyone, in fact he's out to protect.
By the way, the first Hulk was overly cerebral, I have no idea what happened at the end, and it made no sense, at least in this movie we see Banner doing the thinking and Hulk doing the bashing. (In fact when Hulk finally said "Hulk Smash!" I finally said to myself, "now THERES Hulk!", that on top of the signature moves like the sonic clap...)
I think Avengers will work well if they let Bruce AND Hulk be a part of the Avnegers team (he always was)
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
September 16th, 2008 at 14:23
Good, the Avengers shouldn't have Hulk in it anyway. That would be the NEW Avengers, which would totally wipe the slate of the old Avengers--Hawkeye, Vision, Captain America, Ironman, and Antman.
Come on, that blows!