The Dark Knight is one of the biggest releases of this summer, if not the year. How do you prepare yourself for such a monumental picture? By watching previous depictions of Batman in movies, of course. We’re making our way through ten feature length incarnations of the Dark Knight’s stories, from Adam West to animation. We invite you to join us for the ride as we analyze the good, the bad, and the Bat.
(And yes, we’re actually re-watching all of these old flicks rather than just relying on our memory, so we can honestly evaluate each of them in preparation for The Dark Knight).
Day One: Batman: the Movie (1966)
There’s no denying that the Batman television series of the 1960s is the silliest incarnation of the Caped Crusader (although Joel Schumacher would later give that some competition). There’s no dark side to Batman in Batman: the Movie, which is also one of the few Batman flicks to completely ignore the character’s origin. Most Batman stories give some sort of reference to the dark origins of the character, but here the grisly deaths of Mr. and Mrs. Wayne are completely abandoned. When we see Bruce Wayne, he is a playboy, not just using it as a cover.
In fact, any darkness of Batman is eliminated early on in the flick. This is not a vigilante, out for justice. Instead Batman and Robin operate as fully deputized agents of the law - agents who are more than happy to support the local police force, as evidenced by the movie’s dedication and the outlandish statement of support from the Boy Wonder.
Instead Batman: the Movie gives a lighthearted frolicking adventure for Batman (Adam West) and Robin (Burt Ward) as they go up against the United Underworld, the collaboration of the worst of Batman’s rogues gallery: the Joker (Cesar Romero), the Penguin (Burgess Meredith), the Riddler (Frank Gorshin), and Catwoman (Lee Meriweather). The evil team’s plot aims for nothing less than world domination, to be acquired by dehydrating members of the United World Council and holding their remains for ransom.
Don’t ask how ransom of council members leads to world domination. It’s one of many things in the plot that makes no sense. Also making no sense: the giant leaps of logic to figure out the Riddler’s riddles (all of which are solved flawlessly) or why the villains always think they’ve managed to outsmart the dynamic duo when Batman and Robin always emerge victorious. Or, for that matter, the non-stop Deus Ex Machina Batman always has up his sleeve to solve any problem, from his Shark Repellent Bat Spray in the first act to the Super Molecular Dust Separator used to clean up the story’s attempt at a twist.
Changes in pop-culture have not been kind to Batman: the Movie. The movie was probably already perceived as silly in the 60’s (Batman creator Bob Kane was not a fan of the lighthearted approach to his character). But now Burt Ward in the ridiculous Robin costume reminds me more of The Simpsons episode where Milhouse plays Fallout Boy in a parody that is more accurate than folly in retrospect. When Batman and Robin leap into the Batcycle, all I could think of was Sam’s comment in Garden State about riding in a sidecar making you the driver’s bitch. As if Bruce Wayne dressing his teenage ward in tights wasn’t already bad enough.
Still, Batman: the Movie should be required viewing to prepare for any future Batman movie, if for no other reason to remind us where Batman movies started, give us a little campy fun, and to set a low-water mark… provided I don’t think Batman & Robin becomes that low water mark when I watch it again in a few days.
The Good: Lee Meriwether looks awesome as Catwoman, even though the costume doesn’t begin to compare with other incarnations of the character. I have no idea why, but I’ll go around calling “Yo ho” and crying out like the Penguin for days (much to the chagrin of my wife and anyone else around). It sucks, but it’s about all I can say is good about the movie, except for it provides a low-water mark for the future.
The Bad: The story is beyond ridiculous and the characterizations are about as far away from what we expect from these figures as you can get. Most of the villains are poorly used and are one extreme character trait away from being generic, despite being some of the biggest names in the rogues gallery. Batman needs a dark side and an edge, and that just doesn’t exist here.
The Bat: Tons of bat-gadgets to be found here, primarily because anything is made a bat-gadget just by tacking the prefix “bat” onto it. In the first few minutes alone there is the Batmobile, Batcopter (kept at a public airport), Shark Repellent Bat Spray (as well as Barracuda Repellent, Whale Repellent, and Manta-Ray Repellent), Bat-drift, and Bat-ladder (clearly labelled, natch). Later we get the Batcycle, photography development (with Super Fine Batgrain), and Bat-charges. I have to wonder if they tried to sell audiences Bat-popcorn and Bat-cola when the movie was in theatres.
Comment on “Prepare For The Dark Knight: Batman: The Movie”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
The 1966 version of Batman was SUPPOSED to be a comedy! A lot of people cry heresy when I say this, but I think Adam West's Batman was the best version of the character I've ever seen. The people behind the modern Batman movies get too hung up on making it "serious" and "dark". How can you NOT laugh at a guy in a bat suit?
I think you're overanalyzing this movie, which is based on one of the campiest television shows ever created. Sure, this isn't the dark and brooding Batman we've all come to love, but the movie is a product of its time. The TV show didn't actually present the first campy version of Batman... DC did that starting in the late 50s and through the 60s. The TV show basically took the comic book incarnation, which had characters like the Joker attacking Batman and Robin with giant musical instruments, and plopped it on screen. The creators never intended to present a dark character. They simply wanted to show a truly ridiculous one. Don't get me wrong, I much prefer the dark Batman to the campy one, but having grown up on the show, I still laugh when I think about the silliness of Batman worrying about escaping from a giant pie. And as far as figuring out the Riddler's riddles with nonsensical logic, that was exactly the point of the joke which you clearly didn't get. It was a staple of the TV show.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
September 1, 2008 at 16:17
July 14, 2008 at 01:49
July 10, 2008 at 14:35