Hancock may be in trouble. It’s already known that the movie is headed for reshoots, and now we may know why. Below is a review from a CB reader, in which he claims to have seen the film and offers an extremely detailed, spoilerific analysis of the film, and what the hell is wrong with it. Read no further if you don’t want the movie completely and utterly spoiled for you.
Here’s Marlowe with his sneak review of Hancock:
Saw a super-secret advance screening of Hancock yesterday at the Bridge in L.A. Both producer Akiva Goldsman and Sony head Amy Pascal were in attendance. Akiva was looking mighty nervous as the movie was about to unspool... you see, this was a surprise screening for the common folks and not an industry event. No one in the audience knew which film they were seeing as they filed into the room...but everyone was secretly hoping it was the THE DARK KNIGHT. When one of the studio lackeys announced that the film we were seeing was Hancock the reaction was, to say the least, subdued. The usual pre-amble followed about how the effects were not totally rendered, some shots were not color corrected, etc.
Well, Mr. Goldman was right to be nervous... the film is an unmitigated mess... SPOILERS AHEAD--
I mean it. If you want to stay pure and not know a thing about slick Willie's Hancock then now's the time to go back to GTA4.
All right, for those of us still interested:
It opens with slick Willie on the roof of an LA building drunk as a skunk while a radio voice-over tells us in an obvious heavy exposition sequence what an asshole Hancock is... more public nuissance than hero, blah-blah... Hancock walks off the building and slams into the asphalt below destroying the pavement and several cars... he causes lots of property damage throughout the film (it kinda gets redundant, we get it he's a drunk, move on)... as Hancock lays on the smashed concrete while he's smashed from the all the alcohol consumption, a homeless guy walks up to him and calls him an asshole (I can't remember the last time I heard that expletive so often in a big budget summer film)... basically the film spends the next 30 minutes showing us what an asshole Will smith can be...
We cut to the scene in the trailer when he lands in the back of car being chased by cops on Highway, the asian robbers shoot Hancock, bullets bounce off him and Hancock pulls a Fred Flinstone, punching his feet through the floor of the car and bringing it to a halt. He lifts the car into the sky and impales it on the Capitol Records building... what an asshole.
Then Hancock goes to a bar and gets even more drunk, it kinda reminded me of the scene in the excrable Superman 3 when Supes got wasted and started flicking peanuts at the mirrored wall. Anyhow, he's approached by a gorgeous African American girl who comes onto him hard core. Hancock brings her back to his lair-- two nasty, dilapidated motor homes that were stuck together and Hancock precedes to show her his... well, you're not gonna believe this part but he tells the chick that she has to get away from him when he's about to blow his load (the actual quote was "when I climb the mountain")... and then we cut to the exterior shot of the two motor homes rocking like crazy. Willie was giving her his hancock (I know I couldn't resist). Then we cut back inside and the girl flies across the room. Then three large baseball-sized holes are poked through the ceiling of the motor home like gunshots. Yup, this is a first in cinematic history. We get to see the results of super-ejaculate. I never thought I would see super-semen on the big screen... then again, the movie was at one time supposed to be called TONIGHT HE COMES. It all kinda makes sense now. I didn't know wether to laugh or cry... this was preposterous... it was at this point that I knew this was a debacle in the making... the conversation that Jason Lee spoke about in Mallrats which was intended to poke fun at a Superman type hero was actually committed to film. This was definitely a "what the fuck were they thinking moment" if ever I saw one. The problem with this film is that it doesn't know if it wants to be a comedy or a serious action film. Maybe they never knew. But the film only got worse as it went along. The only bright spot was Jason Bateman. God bless Bateman for actually being the grouding force of goodness and smart humor in this mess... although, the way Hancock meets Bateman is cliched. Bateman's car is stuck on the train tracks while a train is careening toward him. A drunken Hancock saves Bateman but not before causing yet more property damage, which upsets the folks at the scene of the accident. Bateman invites Hancock to his house to meet his wife Charlize Theron and his adorable kid (the kid was great, Charlize did the best with her very underdeveloped role). There's an immediate weirdness and wariness between Charlize and Hancock (more on that later).
Bateman is a publicist with big kind heart... the kind of PR schlub that only exist in movies but you buy it because Bateman's so good. He offers to polish Hancock's image. Hancock ultimately takes the offer. Batemen tells Hancock that step 1 is to turn yourself in to the cops. Let the world miss you and then they will come begging for your services. Hancock reluctantly agrees. The whole thing about sending a superbeing to jail was a stupid idea... he can bust out at any moment but I digress. In jail, Hancock encounters many old enemies that he actually put there and then in an altercation, hancock actually shoves an inmates head into another inmates ass... you actually see this!!! You actually see a guy's head in another guys ass! And hilarity ensues. I just could not believe what I was seeing.
Later, a bank robbery occurs with many hostages and a massive shootout. The mayor calls on Hancock for help. In jail, Hancock rises, shaves his scruffy beard with his fingernails and puts on his nifty new supersuit (which looks like a leftover from the X-men franchise). Way to be original, costume design team.
Hancock confronts the redneck madman who has a pressure bomb trigger in his hand. If he let's go of the trigger everyone goes boom!. Hancock severs the bomber's hand saving everyone. The city is grateful, the cops are grateful and so begins Hancock's road to redemption and public image glory.
Also, throughout the film we see FLASHBACKS that show Hancock running thorough a rainy forest with a child in his arms. We always see the same flashback multiple times in the film with a voice-over by Smith about dying vs imoortality but get this-- the Flashbacks are never resolved or explained. i almost felt like I missed something. Like there was a reel missing (hell, maybe there is). It was exactly like the Flashbacks in BATMAN Forever (another Akiva masterpiece) in which little Bruce Wayne keeps seeing a diary beside his parents two coffins... but we never found out what was in the damn diary that so traumatised little Brucie!
Anyway, Bateman and his wife Charlize take Hancock to a fancy restaurant to celebrate his rehabilitated image. At the restaurant, hancock explains that he's not an alien, he's human... the last thing he remembers was waking up in hospital 80 years ago with two tickets to the movie Frankenstein in his pocket, but no other memory. More weirdness between Charlize and Willcock.
Later that night, they all return to Bateman's home. bateman is passed out drunk. Charlize is alone in the kitchen with Hancock. Hancock is about to kiss her when she suddenly picks him up and throws Hancock out the window with vicious force. OH MY GOD, Charlize is a superhero too!!! This is the big twist. Charlize later reveals that she and Will are descendants of Gods or Angels... she was at one time Isis. She also reveals that they were once husband and wife! We also find out that they are each others respective kryptonites. The more time they spend together, the weaker and more mortal they become... so they need to stay apart. She was at the movies with Willcock 80 years ago. They were on the raod to mortality when Will saw a man getting mugged. Will intervened and got clocked in the skull. He lost his memory and Charlize decided to disappear from his life because the world needs one hero-- Hancock!
Willcock wants his wife(Charlize) back and vows to destroy every living thing to get her (this is never really explored or developes but could have been very cool). It leads to a huge showdown between Will and Charlize... more needless property damage. Charlize is stronger than him. Bateman finds out that his wife is a superbeing. He's pissed. Bateman accuses Willcock of being selfish because he wants Bateman's life. Depressed, Hancock goes to a liquor store and buys more booze only to thwart a robbery in progress, except this time the bullets don't bounce off him. He's gunned down and bleeding. He's rushed to the hospital. Bateman and Charlize show up to. This is the climax of the film, so the mad bomber from the bank with the severed hand escapes from Jail and heads to the hospital. Hancock is in a hospital bed, Charlize by his side when the Bomber and his cronies show up and shoot Charlize. She's bleeding and dying. Willcock suddenly gets his suprestregnt back (I have no idea how since they're supposed to be each others kryptonite... I'm still not sure about the rules in this movie).
The doctor's are trying to rescusitate Charlize while Willcock fights the baddies... but the closer Charlize is to death the stronger Will gets... but if she gets better Will gets weaker... to be honest, it was all very muddy and needs to be better explained or edited... I was confused. Anyway, Will throws all the baddies out the windows except for the big villain who is knocked out by an angry Bateman who in turn saves Willcock.
Willcock sees that Charlize is dying and he jumps out of the hospital trying to get as far away from her as possible so she can regain her strenght/immortality/whatever. In the end, bateman and Charlize are together and happy while Hancock is in New York sitting atop the Chrysler building saving lives in the big apple.
In my humble opinion, if the filmmakers want to save this film, drop all the silly stuff, like the super-ejaculation, the inmates head in the ass, and the lousy opening sequence and just stick to a straight forward action film... otherwise this will be Will Smith's first box office dud since WILD WILD WEST.
But what really infuriates me is that with all the resources at their disposal, no one knew what film they were making. This film is the equivalent of being tone deaf. Don't get me wrong, I think Will Smith is an entertaning actor but this film, as is, does not work. Hence, the panic I was reading on the executives faces after the screening. This film is not as dark as it thinks it is and not as funny as it thinks it is. It's right down the middle and that's a dangerous place to be. IRON MAN got the tone right. The DARK KNIGHT knows exactly what it wants to be. HANCOCK is going into the most competitve summer season since the glorious summer of 1989 Half-Cocked.
Comment on “Scooper Review: Hancock Is In Trouble”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
It brought in a lot of interesting elements into it- the profanity and the hero(es) sensitivity to them, the sex questions everyone's been wanting to see (you know you have), the justice in the prisons (cause we all know the filth that goes on in there), the couple warring, emotional elements of abandomnment, the mystery behind his origin, the kid forming an attachment to the superhero (we all want a hero don't we) - obviously quite some content was thrown in there to entertain the mass audience. Whether it be super hero moments where kids and high school teenies cheer for, whether it's older audiences gaining a sense of sympahty to his abandonment 80 years ago, to couples thinking it's cute that the two heroes are bound to one another and yet losing their powers in the process (romantic?), or it be the everyday sexually charge college couple going on their first date and finding the whole ejaculating holes in the trailer roof to be provactive = I think the movie does a good job entertaining the electic masses!
Cut the movie from slack, no movie is ever perfect, try to appreciate them for what they DO provide.
Wow! I'm glad I didn't read your write-up before I saw the movie. I'm guessing you saw a three-hour version of it, and from your description, yuck! I was lucky; the film I saw was a tight 92 minutes. They seem to have cut as you suggested, and while it's still split between action/comedy and that bit of mysterious drama, it worked for me. Full review on SFScope.
Sounds like a lot of folks posting here are going to like anything Will Smith does no matter what. I have liked many of his films myself but this looks like an absolute train wreck. "The trailer is hilarious" "Will Smith is an entertaining actor"
"the whale toss and Will Smith crashing through the highway signs is stuff I've never seen before" The standards of discernment on display here are, uh, 6th grade level at best. Still, I'm keeping my mind as open as I can. I'm expecting a train wreck. If not I'll be pleasantly surprised. Just remember, people; no one stays king of the box office forever. The ride does eventually end and Will Smith's stop could be just up ahead.
I saw "Hancock" today and it has been re-edited. The grosser parts have been removed and the movie flows much better. It stilll is schizoid; "Hancock" doesn't know if its a comedy, romance, or adventure movie.
Everybody has their own opinion and obviously the reviewer had his, bad as it was. I agree with you guys, Will Smith is an awesome actor and has proven that time and time again. If this film doesn't get the block buster ratings as his others, so what! I can't wait to see this movie and I don't think the man can make a bad movie. Even Wild Wild West grossed over $100M. Not bad for a dud, Marlowe!
I was hoping Hancock would be the rebelious badass film that would spark a great trilogy... Oh Hollywood where did you go wrong?
btw: In Batman Forever, we DO find out what it is in the red diary: Bruce's life as written by his father. The last page, as he explains to Chase, is empty, never to be written in again. It's a representation: in many ways, Bruce Wayne died with his parents, and Batman was born. Batman Forever may have sucked hard core, but it was still a batman movie.
Sounds like the reviewer just had a fit because he was looking for a "darker" version of the film then he seen. Its obviously a comedic hero movie where the guy starts out being anti-hero then turns hero.
That wasn't a review, it was a book report (i.e., "And then this happened, and then this happened"). We get it, you saw the movie. We don't need to hear about every moment of the film, just cut to the chase with your opinion. Amaturish.
I'm still excited to see this. I think the special effects in the trailer are awesome looking and a lot of the stuff, like the whale toss and Will Smith crashing through the highway signs is stuff I've never seen before, so I think it's cool to do something new and unique. Plus I'm a big Peter Berg fan, so I have plenty of faith that he would do a great job directing.
Will Smith is entertaining enough that I will still go see the movie. He hasn't disappointed yet. I haven't actually seen Hancock like the reviewer but the trailer looks awesome and I have read positive reviews too. Bateman is one of my favorites and I really believe in this strong cast. I appreciate all the information but I think it's going to be an entertaining film.
I saw this trailer in the theaters last week and I actually am very excited for this film. I like the different type of story and I thin Will Smith will be bring this movie HOME. "Will Smith is an entertaining actor" -- those 6 words alone with drive me to go see this movie. The humor and action is what appealed to me about this film. I will always be a true Will Smith fan and I am definitely gonna be checking this one out! Can't believe everything you read :)
Wow, this guy sounds like he really has it in for this movie for some reason... sure it's not going to be as dark and serious as Dark Knight, if that's what you were expecting, but Dark Knight isn't going to be as funny and irreverent as Hancock! The trailer looks hilarious, and I completely disagree with the high cinema critics 99% of the time anyway. I'm def. still going to see it!
Not a bad piece of writing and I do believe the writer actually unlike some early reviewers on a certain other site did see the movie. One thing that did strike me as a little odd was the writers reference to this year as being the most competitive summer since 1989. Maybe he's not reading BO sites as addictively as I do but none the less it apparently escaped him that the box office has been down by significant margins from last year's summer season so far.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
November 29, 2008 at 19:02
July 1, 2008 at 23:58
June 27, 2008 at 15:24
June 27, 2008 at 02:01
June 20, 2008 at 23:24
June 18, 2008 at 22:18
May 30, 2008 at 22:35
May 30, 2008 at 15:19
May 30, 2008 at 14:28
May 30, 2008 at 14:26
May 30, 2008 at 14:26
May 30, 2008 at 14:26
May 30, 2008 at 14:25
May 29, 2008 at 18:53
May 29, 2008 at 18:53