There's been plenty of talk about how badly over-budget Peter Jackson went with King Kong. $200 million is a pretty hefty price-tag for a monkey movie. But PJ isn't the only one spending exorbitantly in a climate of economic downturn for Hollywood. According to TV Guide, Bryn Singer is sending Superman Returns' budget out into orbit. They say the final price tag for the film may end up being in the range of nearly $300 million.
That’s right, $300 million for Superman's return to cinema. For that much money, they'd better have invented an anti-gravity device. Forget flying harnesses, Brandon Routh ought to have a jet pack in his pants (which WB would no doubt digitally reduce).
The article in TV Guide quotes a source at the New York Post which describes the film as a "money pit". The resulting product is described as "Superman meets The Matrix", which as a moviegoer sounds pretty cool, but financially could be a massive disaster for Singer and Warner Bros.
Is there any truth to it? Box office website The Numbers puts Superman Returns budget at a massive $250 million, so it's not hard to believe that Singer could be heading towards being $50 million over budget.
Right now King Kong is one of the most expensive movie ever made, checking in at around $207 million for production. Kong will barely break even at the box office. Think about this… Superman Returns might cost nearly $100 million more than King Kong. That's enough money to make three normal summer blockbusters starring Tom Cruise. If they're letting Singer spend like that, then clearly Warners is banking on this being another Spider-Man, a movie that made nearly $783 million worldwide. It'll have to be, if Superman Returns is going to avoid turning into a massive, money wasting flop.
Thanks to CB Forumer Trip for the tip.
For more info and stills from Superman Returns, visit our preview page
Comment on “Superman's Return Most Expensive Ever”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
I don't care about the movie's bugdet but i'm really glad the movie's premiere on 28th june. that's my birthday. but unfortunately i can't watch the movie because i lived in a small town in central java, indonesia. hope i'll see the movie soon.
could superman be any more gay? no!!!! movie sucks and proves that Batman is WAY more ninja better than gay superman. superman is lucky to have his powers but batman has acquired his powers though strength and endurance and he, therefore, deserves more superhero ass from hot chicks than super fag. in conclusion, spiderman would be done with one blow from a Batman punch.
i dont think its around 300 million dollars
View a detailed breakdown at BoxOfficeMojo.com, but note that the film had a budget of $204 million, not the site's reported $260 million.
Also i dont think the movie sucks plus Superman Returns IS NOT a GAY MOVIE
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
May 30th, 2006 at 07:56
the is the most expensive ressurection ever!