|
||||||||||||||||||||
The Hobbit Lawsuit ContinuesBy Josh Tyler: 2008-09-26 01:52:05
The Watchmen isn’t the only movie in risk of being shut down by lawsuits and Alan Moore isn’t the only batshit author determined to condemn any adaptation of his work. The same is true of The Hobbit, which has been fighting a legal battle against J.R.R. Tolkien’s heirs for several months now.
Tolkien’s son Christopher Tolkien has long been opposed to any adaptation of his father’s work. He hasn’t seen the Lord of the Rings movies, but he hates them. Recently, he’s been petitioning the courts to halt production of The Hobbit. At issue is cold hard cash. He says New Line Cinema owes him money. Whether or not that’s true, today things took a step forward when according to the AP, a judge did the exact opposite and instead chose to bar Tolkien’s estate from seeking punitive damages against New Line. They had been seeking, in addition to a shutdown of The Hobbit, more than $150 million in payouts, and here’s where things get a bit confusing. The AP’s story says that even though they’ve been barred from seeking punitive damages, an LA Superior Court Judge has also ruled that the Tolkien Estate have established a legal basis for a fraud claim against New Line. No, I do not know what that means. Is there a lawyer in the house? Put those law degrees to work and email me with an explanation. How can the Tolkien Estate can be barred from seeking damages while at the same time getting the go-ahead for a fraud claim, and should we be worried or not? Someone tell me how to feel! Whatever it means, the trial is now scheduled for October of 2009. By then The Hobbit should be well along in production and I’ll be a quivering, weeping mass of legal confusion. RELATED: tolkien, the hobbit
Comment on “The Hobbit Lawsuit Continues”Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
Leave a ReplyMAIN SITE NAVIGATION
HOME l ABOUT US l l SEARCH l MOVIE NEWS l MOVIE REVIEWS l MOVIE PREVIEWS l DVD REVIEWS l DVD NEWS l SOUNDTRACKS l FEATURES DATABASE l TELEVISION l MUSIC l GAMES l CELEBRITY l TECHNOLOGY l RSS 2.0 FEEDS l MESSAGE BOARDS l LIVE CHAT l SYNDICATE US l LINKS | CB STORE | MUNCH MONSTER This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously. Made in Webta Labs 
|
|
October 1st, 2008 at 18:49
They were barred from punitive damages, but establishing the legal basis for fraud still gives them a chance to sue for compensatory damages, which is 7.5% of the LOTR trilogy's gross earnings (they claim that they were entitled to it from the start).