Director Alex Kurtzman Talks About The Deeply Personal People Like Us

By Eric Eisenberg 2012-06-28 22:19:32discussion comments
fb share tweet share
Director Alex Kurtzman Talks About The Deeply Personal People Like Us image
People Like Us was a labor of love for writer/director Alex Kurtzman. In development for eight years, the film is based on his own experience and is a deeply personal story. But for a filmmaker this can be a double-edged sword. The passion drives the project forward, but how do stop yourself from being too stringent and inflexible about the material? For Kurtzman itís about not being beholden to the words themselves, but instead their spirit.

I recently had the chance to sit down one-on-one with the director to talk about his new film, which arrives in theaters tomorrow. Check out our conversation below in which Kurtzman talks about the element that helped him finally crack the story, the experience working with Chris Pine, how his sci-fi/action past affected the progress of this film, and what itís been like to work with Benedict Cumberbatch on the upcoming Star Trek sequel.

This is such a personal story for you, so Iím curious about when you decided that the story could be a movie and when you decided that you wanted it to be a movie.

Maybe Iím a masochist in that I sort of have to wring myself completely and work through stuff in the writing, but I wouldnít be the first writer or songwriter or filmmaker to say thatís how they work out their fits [laughs]. Honestly, I began this journey with no expectation that it would ever become a reality. I just knew that I had to write it, and it was wrong a lot longer than it was right storywise. We went down a lot of wrong roads with the script, thatís why I took eight years to do it. Itís about separating truth from fiction and figuring out what to keep from myself and what to invent without betraying the authenticity of the experience. And it took time. It was one of those things. It just took time. And while itís wildly different from everything else that weíve done, because usually thereís a clock ticking, like, ďThe movie is coming out on this date, you better have a script by this date!Ē This was a total labor of love. Youíre only writing it for you, thereís nobody there waiting for the script, and the only thing thatís going to define whether or not itís right is whether or not itís right [laughs]. You know? And finally after eight years I think we felt like we had cracked the nut and it took that long.

Was there one particular thing that you found and were like, ďThatís it! Thatís what this needed!Ē?

Yes, there absolutely was. Around year six or seven I felt that we had the architecture right, but I did not hear Sam fully. I didnít hear him 100%. I heard Frankie instantly, I could not hear Sam right away. And I kept trying to plug different jobs into Samís background and none of them worked. They were all, actually, quite awful.

What kind of jobs?

Well at first he inherited his fatherís deli, which was a disaster. And then he was a club promoter, which was an even bigger disaster, and then he was a radio engineer, a sound engineer, that was terrible. It was all terrible. And I think at one point he played the piano at the bottom of Bloomingdales, next to the escalator. Literally everything was a convention, it felt like a gimmick. And so I had this feeling that while the architecture of the story was right the character just wasnít believable on some fundamental level. And I was out to dinner with a friend of mine, who is a great screenwriter, and he was telling me that he was in the barter business before he was a writer. And I was like, ďWhatís the barter business?Ē And the minute I heard the pitch, I was like, ďGive me an example,Ē and boom! I get it, I understand it. Thatís Sam, thatís how he lives, and it made sense to me that a character, a guy like this who had grown up in a house of lies, who really was raised to lie to protect himself, would then go into work where you had to sell air and that your livelihood is dependent on your ability to bullshit. So the minute I heard that I knew who he was, I knew how he would behave in scenes, I knew that when the mom said, ďWhy arenít you staying?Ē he would invent a story about soccer balls in the Sudan. I got it. But that wasnít until year seven.

And how much did the casting of Chris Pine affect the character?

Hugely. The character was very much written like that and thatís what Chris responded to, but we just played around a lot withÖwith a movie like this youíre always calibrating. You want to make his arc believable because he starts as a guy who is so allergic to the truth that if he gets there too fast then you donít buy it. So a lot of it with Chris, Chris would say like, ďI think we just need to say less here. Let me play more of it.Ē And he was always right. We would adjust scenes together and he was so smart Ė all of them were so smart. They would ask these great questions about who their character was, their backstory. For example, when Chris walks into that kitchen at the beginning itís totally fraught with something. They have to know exactly why, whereas you, the audience, are going, ďWhat is going on here?Ē And it was that kind of invention of backstory.

When it comes to working with the actors in this story thatís so personal, thatís such a labor of love, how do you avoid being completely beholden to the material and let the actors have input into the story and their characters?

I really donít look at it that way. After eight years part of what I learned is like the onion analogy: the more you peel back the layers the more thereís something else there. And just because we were eight years in and happening I still felt very committed to wanting to make sure that we were really digging as deep as we could in every scene for everything that we needed to get out of it. So there was never a moment of, ďWe have to settle! We have to be done!Ē One of the lessons that I think weíve learned over time with the directors that weíve worked with is that directors need to know thatÖwhen youíre a director youíre dealing with so many things that arenít necessarily just about the script. I think the script is the most important thing, but what if an actor canít say a line that way? What if it doesnít work that way? You need to be able to make the scene work. I think that by being married to the spirit of our words and not always the words, and by really understanding and believing at the core of it that a scene can actually be better when you allow it to be explored. A director feels safe that way because then you donít feel like youíre locking in on something. And then when you do say, ďNo, it needs to be this,Ē theyíll go, ďOkay, I guess it needs to be that.Ē

In addition to being your first time as a director, this project is also a real change of pace for you and Roberto Orci, who have been a huge part of the action/sci-fi genres for a couple of years now. With that reputation, do you think it makes it easier or harder to make a movie like this?

I donít know that I can speak to a generality about that, but I can tell you that in my experience, so much of what I learned by watching directors I ended up applying to my directing. I think that we were afforded more opportunities because weíve worked in the studio system now for a while, so it allowed us to be close to people that we could pull into the movie. Which, obviously, if I werenít working around those people I would have never had had that opportunity. So Iím unbelievably grateful for that.

I do also want to quickly ask about the Star Trek sequel. I know that you guys are keeping the identity of the villain under wraps, and I totally get that, but I was hoping you could talk a bit about working with Benedict Cumberbatch. Is this a character thatís going to really scare us, mystify usÖ

Heís a genius. There are certain actors who have the ability to take a line of dialogue and add a ring to it that you didnít even know you put into the dialogue, into the line. And heís one of those really brilliant actors. Just listening to him talkÖyou could enjoy him reading the phone book. I was just saying to somebody else, sequels are about your bad guy. Because your first movie is always about the becoming of [the hero] and your bad guy has to test that hero in a very significant way. And heís an incredibly formidable presence. Heís amazing. Are you going to be scared of him? Shit yeah!
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to top