|
||||||||||||||||||||
Letters from Iwo Jima - Review
Length: 141 min Rated: R Distributor: Warner Brothers Release Date: 2006-12-20 Starring: Ken Watanabe, Kazunari Ninomiya, Shido Nakamura, Tsuyoshi Ihara, Ryo Kase, Yuki Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Watanabe, Takumi Bando, Nobumasa Sakagami, Takashi Yamaguchi
Directed by Clint Eastwood
Produced by Clint Eastwood, Robert Lorenz, Steven Spielberg
Written by Iris Yamashita
Visit the movie's Official Site!
It begins months before the United States’s invasion of the tiny Japanese island for which the movie is named, with Imperial troops fortifying and digging in. The war effort isn’t going well, and everyone knows Iwo Jima is a death trap. General Tadamichi Kuribayashi (Ken Watanabe) takes command of the Japanese forces stationed there, because everyone else refused the job. He arrives and insists on a walking tour of the island against his officer’s advice and immediately realizes they’ve got everything all wrong. Kuribayashi has traveled and studied in American, and knows how the Americans think. They can’t count on outside support, the Japanese military is in disarray, the navy has been defeated, and the Emperor is bringing all of their air assets home to prepare a last-ditch defense of the mainland, leaving Kuribayashi’s thousands of ground troops stranded alone on a blasted island, trapped like rats. He tears apart his commander’s defensive plans and makes them redo everything from scratch. He doesn’t make a lot of friends among the force’s weary warriors. But they must not fall. Iwo Jima is the last line of defense before the Americans can attack the Japanese mainland. Kuribayashi sets his troops to digging in. By the time the Americans arrive to being their assault, the Japanese forces are hidden in a network of caves and tunnels throughout the island. The film quickly becomes a study in claustrophobia as Japanese troops futilely attempt to bear up under the unceasing waves of American attack. Kuribayashi must struggle against his own men’s code of honor, as soldiers schooled in the old way of honor fighting refuse to retreat, preferring suicide to tactical withdrawal. No one is allowed to die, says Kuribayashi, until he has killed ten enemy soldiers. They’re fighting a losing battle, they know they’re all dead, and in the midst of one of the most vicious, protracted pieces of war the world has ever seen, Letters tells individual stories of heroism as Japanese fighters prepare to die. In doing so, the movie raises interesting questions about what courage is. Which is real bravery? The soldier who rushes heedlessly into battle to give his life in service to his country, or the man who refuses to die, so that he can make it back home to see his wife and daughter? Kuribayashi believes that a dead soldier is a useless soldier, and desperately tries to convince his troops to learn when to withdraw and survive another day. His commanders see only their old code of honor, and prefer death to the dishonor of defeat. In the end, none of it matters. They’re all dead, and they know it. Letters from Iwo Jima isn’t a movie about finding victory, but a lesson in what it really means to die with honor. Iris Yamashita’s script is heartbreaking, capturing the broader strokes of what’s happening in the battle by focusing on the quiet internal struggle going on inside individuals in Kuribayashi’s doomed forces. The movie’s central character is a former young baker named Saigo (Kazunari Ninomiya), impressed into service by the Emperor and ripped away from his wife and unborn daughter to die on Iwo Jima’s distant shores. When everyone around him is looking for a way to die, he’s looking for a way to live, and the movie’s journey is really his as he escapes one route after another until he ends up with Kuribayashi right at the very end. All around him one comrade after another dies, some willingly, some go kicking and screaming. But Saigo scrambles on, dodging death, avoiding suspicions among his fellow troops, his only thought to find a way home to his baby and wife. As Flags was, Letters is shot in washed out colors by Eastwood and Cinematographer Tom Stern, the only vibrancy coming from explosions, fire, and blood. The film is completely without glamour or glitz, yet in its bleakness is a kind of desperate beauty. This is as dire and moving war movie, the story of men being chewed up and spit out by forces beyond their control. It’s the film so many had hoped Flags of our Fathers would be and wasn’t. Eastwood finds more to say in defeat than he does in victory.
Thumbnails Gallery for Letters from Iwo Jima
     Social Bookmark This Article Blinklist
 Del.icio.us
 Digg
 Furl
 Slashdot
 Facebook
 StumbleUpon
 Yahoo!
 Propeller
Comment on “Letters from Iwo Jima”Note: This website is not intended for use by minors. The views expressed in this comments section are not necessarily our own. Comments that we deem to be poorly worded, off topic, or threatening will not be published. For free, uncensored discussion visit our forum.
Leave a ReplyMAIN SITE NAVIGATION
HOME l ABOUT US l l SEARCH l MOVIE NEWS l MOVIE REVIEWS l MOVIE PREVIEWS l DVD REVIEWS l DVD NEWS l SOUNDTRACKS l FEATURES DATABASE l TELEVISION l MUSIC l GAMES l CELEBRITY l TECHNOLOGY l RSS 2.0 FEEDS l MESSAGE BOARDS l LIVE CHAT l SYNDICATE US l LINKS | CB STORE | GIANT FREAKIN ROBOT This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously. Made in Webta Labs 
|
|
December 9th, 2006 at 14:05
I'm really glad you liked Iwo Jima but this ...
'Letters from Iwo Jima does everything that Flags of our Fathers failed to do. In other words it actually tells the story of the fight, instead of getting bogged down in a war bonds marketing campaign back home'
.. just shows how completely you misunderstood Flags. That movie used the battle of Iwo Jima as a backdrop to a thoughtful meditation on heroism and the effect of war on the survivors. Now fair enough if you didn't like the movie but for heavens sake at least recognise the film for what it was not what you wanted it to be. I think it's very revealing just how many critics of Flags always rationalize their disappointment in terms of 'I was expecting Saving Private Ryan ...', as if they can't conceive of any other kind of war picture. I suppose an analogy would be watching Kubrick's 2001 and then coming out complaining about the lack of laser beam fights and space battles. That may be right but it's simply irrelevant. Anyway, thanks for the review and I look forward greatly to seeing Letters.