X-Files: I Want To Believe - Review

Discuss this movie on our message board!

Length: 100 min

Rated: PG-13

Distributor: 20th Century Fox

Release Date: 2008-07-25

Starring: David Duchovny, Gillian Anderson, Amanda Peet, Billy Connolly, Xzibit, Callum Keith Rennie

Directed by Chris Carter

Produced by Chris Carter, Frank Spotnitz

Written by Chris Carter, Frank Spotnitz

Visit the movie's Official Site!

Reviewed by Scott Gwin : 2008-07-25 10:08:54

X-Files fans (those few of you left), rejoice! Chris Carter has not forgotten you! Realizing that you must be desperate for another fix, he has delved deeply into the crumbling plastic bag that was the original television show and delivered up the last few remaining granules of X-Files crack into your anxious, shaking, little hands. I say last because, if this movie is any indication, the baggie is now empty, with nothing left to offer, not even to the most irrational devotee.

The television show, which withered in its final seasons and has been off the air for several years now, centered on paranormal and unexplainable phenomena, giving particular attention to extra terrestrial life (the subject of the far more interesting and successful first X-Files movie). In the midst of all the investigations came the increasingly complex connection between the show’s iconic characters, Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson), and their internal struggles with the mysterious subject matter they tackled every week.

For this sequel, X-Files: I Want To Believe, writer, director and creator Carter waxes poignant with his two beloved characters. In fact, he’s so enamored with their relationship that he forgets to add any excitement to the case meant to bring them back together. He spends most of the film wallowing in the emotional and psychological issues surrounding the two, filling in the gaps with a mystery so sleepy it might have been pulled from the “rejected” pile of the show’s early days. It seems the man has been studying at the George Lucas school of “keep meddling with your sci-fi legacy until it’s a festering pool of drivel.” Scully, long disillusioned with her work with the FBI, has taken a position in a Catholic hospital treating terminally ill children. Mulder, hiding out from the agency, is holed up in a cabin in the middle of nowhere, laying low and indulging his conspiracy theory fetish by clipping newspapers and growing a hermit’s beard. Carter offers some info on the characters as the movie begins, but he clearly can’t be bothered with bigger details like offering any reason whatsoever that you should invest yourself in their story. He takes for granted that the audience is coming to the story with the same built in love and devotion that he holds for the two, a flawed assumption that dooms the movie from the start. It goes downhill from there.

When one of its agents goes missing, the FBI has only one clue to her disappearance: an ex-priest turned penitent pedophile (Billy Connolly) who claims psychic visions are revealing the woman’s fate to him. The agency turns to the experts in such matters, Scully and Mulder, who reluctantly allow themselves to become involved. Mulder immediately resumes his mantra of wanting to believe and Scully goes back to her skeptical ways. The characters run around in circles, looking for clues and theorizing the existential, spending more time trying to figure out if they can salvage their love than if they can save anyone’s life.

Carter’s script flounders desperately, taking cheap short cuts and grasping at weak tricks to keep the movie going. For example, when Scully is preparing to perform a complicated and risky procedure to save one of her patients, she goes about it with a Google search for “stem cell research”. Moments meant to be scary are predictable or toothless (lots of dogs barking at shadows and Mulder sneaking up on a thought-engrossed Scully from behind). Even the movie’s setting, the dark snowy forests of West Virginia, feels like it was ripped off from the likes of Fargo.

Given the flatness of the plot and the blandness of the characters, I’m left wondering what on earth drew Duchovny and Anderson back for this pointless sequel. Anderson has proven she’s worthy of much better (if you haven’t seen her in House of Mirth, you need to re-prioritize your Netflix queue immediately) and given the success of Duchovny’s new Emmy award winning show “Calinfornication” the man can’t be hurting for a paycheck. Sadly their performances in this movie are as listless as the script, hinting hopefully that they too are finally ready to say goodbye to these characters forever. The question is, can Carter take the hint?

Yes, fans, this may be your last tryst with your beloved X-Files characters. With little appeal for general audiences, the movie is unlikely to do well, spelling doom for any horrible trilogy rumors that may be floating about. So take these last precious grains of Chris Carter crack, drop them feebly into your pipes and smoke the few puffs that may waft out. The time has come to close the X-Files for good, and whether or note you want to admit it, that’s all for the best.

Latest Movie Reviews:

Social Bookmark This Article

Blinklist

Del.icio.us

Digg

Furl

Slashdot

Facebook

StumbleUpon

Yahoo!

Propeller

Comment on “X-Files: I Want To Believe”

Note: This website is not intended for use by minors. The views expressed in this comments section are not necessarily our own. Comments that we deem to be poorly worded, off topic, or threatening will not be published. For free, uncensored discussion visit our forum.

beau Says:
July 26th, 2008 at 12:23
Never a full-blown addict of the show, I did, upon seeing the posters for the latest installment, feel a twinge of longing for old habits. More like a tobacco smoker who'd quit some time ago. So I find myself disappointed to hear that it's not all that good. A pity. There was so much potential there. Or so it seemed at the time. Way to show some tough love, Gwin. That's the way to treat addicts of any sort.

I would also add Anderson's brief turn in The Last King of Scotland to the list of must-sees.

sasha Says:
July 27th, 2008 at 01:08
for someone to not even be a fan of the show (which isn't necessary for viewing or enjoying the movies) it seems rather silly to diss the fans. if your personal opinion is ALREADY negative.. why bother? moron.

beau Says:
July 27th, 2008 at 17:42
Nobody's "dissing" the fans. He's "dissing" the movie (or more precisely the director, writer, and producers) for failing to satisfy the fans. Nobody's personal opinion was "ALREADY negative." "Crack addict" is a more than apt metaphor for devoted X-Files fans. Believe me I sat and watched the show for two years with five of 'em. Addicts. All of them . . .

Stop name calling. It's unbecoming of you.

brodie Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 18:38
Sure sounds like he is dissing the fans ( those few of you left ) and ( must be desperate for another fix ) . If you are going to review a movie for others at least have an open mind weather you like it or not, each persons tastes are different... Anyway not a weekly fan but the X files did have some good episodes here and there and it was much better than some of the crap on TV like Sinfield or Cosby or even better the Simpson's which in my opinion where all a waste of 30 minutes..............

Crendler Says:
July 30th, 2008 at 02:18
Such a joyless person. I wonder how this fellow gets through a single day without attempting suicide. Admittedly, Hollywood sucks anymore, but why bear such a burden as to review this drek voluntarily? Oh, I know: such vitriol keeps you from going crazy and killing people with an axe. Well kudos to you, sir.

Scott Says:
July 30th, 2008 at 12:27
To Brodie:

Let's face it, people who would qualify as current fans of the show (i.e. those who still watch the show regularly on DVD, frequent X-Files forums. have "I WANT TO BELIEVE POSTERS" somewhere in their house and who have been clamoring for another movie ever since the TV show went off the air) meet both the criteria: they are dwindling in numbers and they've been pushing for another movie. It's not dissing...it's calling it like it is.

To Crendler:

I'm not exactly sure how my disappointment with the film makes me a joyless person, but taking pleasure in a miserable entertainment experience is the sign of being a little bit crazy, not the other way around.

I, and other reviewers, bear this sort of "vitriol" because if we didn't we'd be accused of only reviewing movies we like. Instead, we try to review the dreck right along with the excellent lest we be accused of bias.

Honestly, I think NOT seeing this kind of drivel would do a better job of hedging any homicidal tendencies I might experience.

Scott

jOsH Says:
August 5th, 2008 at 13:36
Pathetic! As a huge fan very disapointed! What were you smoking when you came up with this.

helas Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 03:30
I was a big X-Phile back in the day and would have loved to have seen a great new X-movie, but sadly, Carter and crew blew it. It happens. It won't do any good for critics to blast the fans or for fans to insult the critics - it's over.

Mary Says:
September 1st, 2008 at 01:44
Despite what many say about the film being a failure -- I LOVED IT! While it was different to the tv episodes, I think that was a good thing. It was a more mature storyline, the characters were more mature and deeper, and I think Chris, Frank, DD, GA and the rest of the team did an awesome job.
We are all entitled to our opinions and fair enough if you didn't like the movie. But I loved it.

Back to X-Files: I Want To Believe

X-Files: I Want To Believe - Review

Social Bookmark This Article

Comment on “X-Files: I Want To Believe”

Leave a Reply