|
|||||||||||||||||||
TV Review: Ugly Betty: Skin-Deep, Confectionary Goodness
By Logan Scherer: 2006-09-28 00:00:00
The Devil wouldn’t be caught dead in a Guadalajaran poncho, but he’d certainly get wicked enjoyment out of watching an ugly young woman going to her first day of work at a powerhouse fashion magazine in one. The Americanized version of the hit telenovela, ‘Ugly Betty,’ prides itself in a campy derivativeness bogged down in a soap opera grandeur. The show is a rip-off in every sense of the word: its storylines are recycled and there is a palpable sense of unoriginality everywhere (maybe because this entire idea was just done in “The Devil Wears Prada”), even in the sets. Uninventiveness, however, is crucial when attempting to mock things that are conventional. It is here that ‘Ugly Betty’ is ironically good looking.
There is a decided separation between good and evil in the typical telenovela. America Ferrera’s Betty Suarez is the endearing embodiment of goodness. She is a character that could have been wholly annoying and inappropriately whiny, but Ferrera’s juicily perfect creation may just have made being good the new evil. On her first day as assistant to Editor-in-Chief of Mode Magazine (a job that she surprisingly got just because of her looks), Betty ungracefully walks into a glass door, perhaps giving a sign to herself that she just doesn’t belong in the chic, unforgiving world of fashion. Vanessa Williams’ Wilhelmina is the exact antithesis to the utter goodness of Betty. Everyone seems to be sabotaging everyone (in true telenovela fashion) in over-the-top circumstances and, with a critically satirical eye, it works. Editor-in-Chief Daniel Meade, delightfully nuanced by Eric Mabius, is the beneficent jerk who defies telenovela standards of characterization. The show both embraces and mocks its telenovela roots with a schizophrenic attitude that, though at times awkwardly unfunny, ultimately feels very right. Hilarious interspersed scenes of a televised Salma Hayek in a mock telenovela curiously sum up the appeal of ‘Ugly Betty’: unconscious cynicism intermingled with witty mindlessness. It’s an uncanny formula whose unlikely success depends on a dual Americanization. The American take of the Colombian sensation adds an indulgingly analytical side to soapy trashiness while using clichéd laughs (but, really, it’s not nearly as schmaltzy as it sounds). America Ferrera’s delectable performance, however, is the real America-nization here. She has made a character so lovably imperfect that the obvious imperfections of the flawed ‘Ugly Betty’ become as unimportant as the anti-fashionista is to her unforgiving co-workers. And it all, in one way or another, perhaps by some unexplainable luck, becomes quite consequential.
Comment on “TV Review: Ugly Betty: Skin-Deep, Confectionary Goodness”Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.Subscribe to topic comments Subscribe to topic comments Leave a ReplyMAIN SITE NAVIGATION
HOME l ABOUT US l l SEARCH l MOVIE NEWS l MOVIE REVIEWS l MOVIE PREVIEWS l DVD REVIEWS l DVD NEWS l SOUNDTRACKS l FEATURES DATABASE l TELEVISION l MUSIC l GAMES l CELEBRITY l TECHNOLOGY l RSS 2.0 FEEDS l MESSAGE BOARDS l LIVE CHAT l SYNDICATE US l LINKS | CB STORE | MUNCH MONSTER | GFR This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously. Made in Webta Labs 
|
|
October 4, 2006 at 18:13
October 4, 2006 at 15:36