Natalie Portman Naked Again

By Josh Tyler: 2006-07-05 00:00:00

Earlier this year Natalie Portman took off her hair in V for Vendetta, for her next movie she’s taking off her clothes. According to BANG Media, Natalie has filmed nude torture scenes for her part in the upcoming Milos Foreman movie Goya’s Ghosts.

What’s interesting about this, besides the obvious skin implications, is that the last time Natalie filmed nude scenes for a movie she changed her mind at the last minute and lobbied successfully for the director to have them cut. The result was Closer, a movie in which she played a stripper who inexplicably never stripped anything off.

Natalie has in the past admitted that she’s got a problem with nude scenes, and claims she’s never been comfortable as a sex object. So the question here is whether or not Foreman’s Natalie nudity will make it to the final cut?

In the film, Natalie plays the muse of painter Francisco Goya. She becomes embroiled in controversy when she and Goya are labeled heretics by a monk. How this leads to totally naked torture is anyone’s guess, but apparently that’s a pivotal scene in the film.

So start the watch. Will Portman’s nude scene make it to theaters this time, or will she panic at the last minute and have it snipped? At least this time she’s not playing a stripper, I doubt this movie will suffer if a little bit of skin is from the picture. You can’t blame her for being hesitant, how many of you are ready to drop your drawers on camera and end up as part of MrSkin.com? I know I’m not.

Latest Headlines:

Even More Alice In Wonderland Images

Strange Patriotism: The American Flag's Weirdest Moments On Film

Inglourious Basterds Banners

View-Master: The Movie

Tony Stark's Iron Man 2 Race Car

Superman May Be Done With Brandon Routh

First Look At Eminem in Funny People

Public Enemies Poll: Tell Us What You Think

Jessica Biel In Thor?

See Kristen Stewart And Dakota Fanning As The Runaways

Comment on “Natalie Portman Naked Again”

Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.

Subscribe to topic comments

0 0 / 0
y n

oth
September 16, 2008 at 02:57

sweetiest & ever sexiest female . i dream of her

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

mustafa moHOUNDmud
November 28, 2007 at 23:09

nudity is EVIL. nudity is to be covered with clothing!

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Mike
April 16, 2007 at 23:26

Role Model: Over-fucking used! Let's try to get out of the "she's a - he's a - role model, ok?" I'm tired of that stupid ass phrase!

I'd love to see Natalie naked, her stripper scenes were hot and she's got a great body. I say take it off now and be proud before you get old and you wished you looked like that again. Celluloid is forever, show what you got and have it in movies for all eternity.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Omar
September 6, 2006 at 16:31

i love Natalie Portman. i hope i dont see my dream grl nude or else da Filmer nd da director r gonna pay!!!!!! how dare they display such a beautiful person, a woman,the most beautiful creature god has made

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

G.M.
July 18, 2006 at 22:48

i agree with the people that say america is too uptight about nudidty and sex... back when it was wrong for women to show legs men got turned on by looking at chair legs. It became such a problem that they started putting covers over the legs of furniture. So the more you hide something the more people want to see it,

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

...
July 13, 2006 at 15:58

michael if you dont have a problem why dont you do it then. dont say is not a big deal and tell people to grow up because you should be saying that to yourself... some people feel cumfortable with showing there body and so people dont so whats the point. if she doesnt want to do it so she wont... i think is great that she wont do it it makes me look up to her more. dont get me wrong i am not a freak of her but there arew thing i have learned from her.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

...
July 13, 2006 at 15:58

kc the only reason you say that is because you want to see her like that. i am a huge fan of natalie and she is a great roll model, whatching her in a movie like that will be a really big shock for me. the fact that some people doesnt want to see her showing her body doesnt mean that we need to grow up is the fact that we know her, technically but still. besides cutting that kind of scene wont damage or kill a movie so whats the point really. i dont have a problem with nudity but i dont believe is cool showing your body to the hole unverse so thats all.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Phil
July 12, 2006 at 11:00

Unfortunately, Natalie Portman is not going to appear nude in her new movie â€œGoyaâ€™s Ghost.â€ The rumor, which went unnoticed when it appeared on the movie news website Aint It Coolnews last month, was spread all over the internet yesterday. But it appears their source was not very reliable. The actressâ€™ agent set the record straight yesterday by telling Access Hollywood that the nude torture scene in the movie is performed by a body double, not Natalie.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Michael
July 8, 2006 at 08:23

I agree with KC and Andy, it is so stupid that a nude scene would be such a big deal. It is BECAUSE we make it such a big deal that Mrskin exists. That being said, I don't think that an actress should have to drop top or trou every time the wind (or Pamela Anderson) blows. The topless scene that Sarah Polley did in The Secret Life of Words was absolutely integral to the plot, it had to be done, there was no other way. Some other actress wanted the part and help up production while she tried to use her "clout" to get the scene removed, meanwhile a real actress like Sarah Polley was waiting in the wings ready to do what was necessary for the plot. It is somewhat noteworthy that the actress holding up production trying to get the nude scene out was American, while Sarah Polley who did the scene is Canadian. I think if it makes sense, it's important OR the actress is simply *willing* then a nude scene needs no justification, which I know is a paradoxical statement, but then so is integrity in Hollywood, go figure.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Andy
July 8, 2006 at 00:47

I've got to agree with KC. Americans - me being a proud one - are a little too uptight about nudity and WAY too uptight about sex.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

kc
July 7, 2006 at 21:14

It says a lot about her as a person.
What does it say about a person, Joshua? That they're hung up with American ideals about nudity & sex in general? Please. The human body is a work of art and should be displayed. The obsessiveness with which American media focuses on this nudity is the problem.
Grow up.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

~Joshua
July 6, 2006 at 11:28

I admire the fact that she does not pose nude on film. It says a lot about her as a person.

Reply
0 0 / 0
y n

Portman-Loyalist
July 5, 2006 at 17:03

i think Natalie will do what she did for Closer & have them cut. it sounds that the film will NOT suffer at all if it's cut. Natalie has been my rolemodel for quite sometime. i admire how she doesn't want to be a sex objuect or anything like that!! i'm sure they'll be cut,or atleast cut down to just a moment or 2.

Reply

Subscribe to topic comments

Please login or sign up to post reply

Back to Natalie Portman Naked Again

Natalie Portman Naked Again

Comment on “Natalie Portman Naked Again”

Leave a Reply