A book inspired by a rape witnessed by the author is bound to get a little dark. But itís that tinge of grimness added to the normal mystery format that made The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
a New York Times bestseller for multiple weeks. And itís because of that dark atmosphere that The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
is so compelling when itís recreated onscreen.
David Fincherís The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
has its own walk and its own talk, even when it sticks remarkably close to Stieg Larssonís original story. Some of the creative license Fincher takes might throw those of us whoíve enjoyed the novel off a bit, but itís all in the name of streamlining.† Below are the top 8 changes I noticed from the book to the movie in my screening of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
. Some of these changes are purposeful, others detract a bit, but they all come together to make for one hell of a movie.
Warning: There are many spoilers in this †Girl With The Dragon Tattoo book to movie comparison. Best left alone until youíve actually seen the movie.
This is Salanderís world, more than Blomkvistís.
We are reminded of this again and again as Blomkvistís personal world is condensed into a tiny bubble. The Wennerstrom affair, Blomkvistís relationships, and the problems at Millennium are all put on the backburner. Alternatively, time spent with Salander is expanded and feels more significant. It seems Fincher knew she would be more fun to watch.
Salanderís personal relationships are more limited.
For the sake of cutting minority characters, her mother is nonexistent and her non-hacker group of friends are never introduced. Salander is always outside looking in within the books, but in the movie she is defined by this loneliness and alienation. It puts her in a much neater package in some ways, but it also makes more sense.
The clues to the mystery are more rapidly discerned and are less in-depth.
This is a big one. For example, Blomkvist jumps at identifying Anita in a window just moments after he starts looking at Vanger family photos. Substitutions like these work, but they certainly have less of a punch than the aha! moments in the book.
Martin is never mentioned as a withdrawn boy and he never outwardly threatens as an adult.
Some old photos show him as seeming slightly off. However, in Fincherís movie, Martin is forever the congenial adult. Heís a true master manipulator, and heís a hell of a lot more compelling to watch.
There are fewer key players who could have committed the crime.
Instead of multiple family members with multiple possible motives or at least some shady momentum, the only Vangers that matter are Henrik and Martin, and of course, Frode. Other Vangers, including Harold, Cecilia, and Isabella, are barely present beyond mentions. The lack of population doesnít detract from the viewing, but it does make determining the ďwhomĒ of the killer (though not the why) an iota easier.
Lisbeth Salander is even more of a badass.
How is this possible? †I mean sheís already a pretty huge badass, but in Fincherís adaptation we get to see her masterfully fight against a would-be computer thief. She also returns to face her rapist, threatening him even after the initial tattoo justice. She manages to mesmerize us even as she repels us.
Lisbeth runs Martin Vanger off the road.
Though Martin does manage to escape in the same manner, †he doesnít chicken out and run himself purposefully into oncoming traffic. Showing her prowess, Lisbeth gets a little too close and Martin accidentally runs himself off the road. Itís a more satisfying way for the sadist mastermind to lose everything heís carefully constructed. †
While Harriet Vanger is very much alive, she doesnít show up where expected.
Sheís unmarried and living as Anita in London, a role the real Anita takes in the book. When the pieces of Blomkvistís puzzle finally cement together, itís a great moment, one that is furthered by Anita/Harriet having been introduced earlier in the film.
It shouldnít be easy to fit a six hundred and something page book into a two and a half hour movie. If you look at the longer Harry Potter
books turned into movies, for example, there are so many plots that must be refocused or cobbled together differently the whole thing nearly feels like a new adventure. In The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
, the details of Stieg Larssonís storyline are so meticulous that most changes are either barely noticeable blemishes or are changes that work for the better.
Overall, I would argue The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
makes for a superior film than a book. However, if you are of a mind thatís into thousands of rigid details, Iíd certainly suggest the read over the more glossy film.
If you noticed anything I missed, feel free to join the conversation in the comments section, below.
Do you prefer the book of the movie of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo?