Friday Box Office Predicts Puss In Boots Beating Out Tower Heist For The Weekend

By Katey Rich 2011-11-05 11:48:23discussion comments
fb share tweet share
Friday Box Office Predicts Puss In Boots Beating Out Tower Heist For The Weekend image
Tower Heist is undoubtedly the big new release of the weekend, with a starry cast and a huge marketing campaign, but it still may manage to be undone by a cat in a big floppy hat and conquistador boots. Early numbers from the Friday box office have Puss in Boots poised to win the weekend again, netting $7.9 million to Tower Heist's $8.1 million on Friday, but likely to bring in a lot from the kids on Saturday. Estimates at THR put Puss at $27.5 million for the weekend, just edging out Tower Heist's estimated $25 million.

Tower Heist was carefully budgeted to not be too expensive, and at an $85 million budget it's still likely to be profitable. Still, Universal and producer Brian Grazer were apparently hoping for a $30 million opening, and given the names like Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy involved, they had reason to expect it.

The other new release of the weekend, A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas, also performed worse than expected, making $5.4 million on Friday and estimated for a $14 million weekend. But while Tower Heist is only pretending to be cheap, Harold & Kumar-- like all of the previous movies-- is the real deal, costing only $20 million to produce. Given DVD sales and the stark need for a perennial stoner holiday classic, there's no way Harold & Kumar won't turn out to be a good investment.

Rounding out the Friday top 5 were holdovers Paranormal Activity 3-- which is somehow hanging on even with Halloween past us-- and In Time, which continues to fail to prove that Justin Timberlake is a real movie star. How about you guys-- are you seeing any of these movies/ Are you surprised that Tower Heist opened so low? Or do you see this as just the punishment that Brett Ratner still deserves for X-Men: The Last Stand?
Blended From Around The Web
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to top