We’ve heard this time and time again, that new releases will show a "new side" of established actors. BBut this time it may actually be true. Most audiences probably know actress Blake Lively as the star of Gossip Girl and films like The Age of Adaline. She’s shown more of her talent and range in movies like The Shallows, The Town and A Simple Favor, but this weekend you’ll be able to see the blonde bombshell as you’ve truly never seen her before in The Rhythm Section.
Revenge movies never go out of style and this one from The Handmaid’s Tale director Reed Morano stars a nearly unrecognizable Blake Lively as a broken woman named Stephanie Patrick who finds a new violent purpose when she discovers that the plane crash that killed her family was not an accident. The Rhythm Section is based on a series of books by Mark Burnell who adapted his own work for the movie’s screenplay. So, how is it?
Well, that will really depend on who you ask. The first reviews for The Rhythm Section are in and critics are divided on this one. CinemaBlend’s own Mike Reyes was a fan though and gave The Rhythm Section 3.5 out of 5 stars in his review. Mike wrote:
The Rhythm Section and Blake Lively’s Stephanie Patrick are given a truly R-rated start to something rougher than most spy films we've seen. Which is brilliant, considering the world has wondered if we’d ever get a female James Bond, and Mark Burnell’s screenplay (based on his very own novel) proves that we don’t need one.
The James Bond comparisons are not surprising given that The Rhythm Section comes from Eon Productions, which also makes those spy films. But according to Mike, The Rhythm Section is something different, something that is brutal and brilliant. There is no need for a female Bond when there are original female characters like Blake Lively’s Stephanie Patrick.
Mike wasn't the only one who enjoyed The Rhythm Section. Variety's Peter DeBruge also appreciated Reed Morano's film, especially the approach to the lead character and Blake Lively's performance in the role. In his review Peter wrote:
The plot may be boilerplate in this female-driven revenge thriller, but Blake Lively sells it, playing an action hero who fights like a real person: badly.
Unlike Daniel Craig's James Bond or Liam Neeson's Bryan Mills or Charlize Theron's Lorraine Broughton, Blake Lively's Stephanie Patrick is not a highly-skilled, cold-blooded assassin. In fact, she's pretty bad at first and basically stumbles her way through. That approach to this kind of character sets The Rhythm Section apart from many of its contemporaries.
Variety highlighted Blake Lively's performance and it wasn't the only one. The strength of the actress's work in The Rhythm Section is a common thread in many of the reviews for the film. Digital Spy's Ian Sandwell gave The Rhythm Section 3 out of 5 stars and wrote:
Through it all though, The Rhythm Section is propelled by a compelling performance from Blake Lively…Following on from the excellent A Simple Favor, it's another dark role for her and it's clear she relishes playing against type. She manages to make corny lines work – ‘How would you do that?’ she's asked of her mission and replies, ‘Violently’ – and convinces in the brutal one-on-one fight scenes
Fortunately, there's Lively, adopting a convincing British accent, who almost, but not quite, manages to infuse the convoluted goings-on with enough gravitas to make them convincing.
Those convoluted goings-on cited by Frank Scheck proved to be too much for some critics, with the weakness of the film's script popping up in multiple reviews for The Rhythm Section. One critic who found those weaknesses particularly offensive was The Chicago Sun Times' Richard Roeper. He gave The Rhythm Section 1.5 out of 4 stars and wrote:
Despite a game performance by Lively, The Rhythm Section is a junk pile of missteps, from the convoluted screenplay that hops from locale to locale in Advil-inducing fashion to the overly stylized directing to the self-consciously 'cool' oldies pop music selections.
We've heard about Blake Lively's performance, but this is a revenge spy thriller and if you've seen the trailers for The Rhythm Section you know that there is plenty of violence and action in this movie. So how do those elements stack up? Fairly well according to The Guardian's Peter Bradshaw, who gave The Rhythm Section 3 out of 5 stars in his review and said:
[Reed] Morano puts together good fight scenes, robust stunt work and tasty car chases. It’s destined to be viewed on a million long-haul flights, but it works perfectly well as a thriller.
While many audience members might not know it, The Rhythm Section is the first in a series of books. So the feature film adaptation could in theory be the first of multiple movies. It's too early to know if that will be the case, but it seems there is potential there, at least in part because of the lead performance and the fact that the film isn't overly concerned with it. Forbes' Scott Mendelson wrote:
The Rhythm Section isn’t concerned with franchise-set up or worldbuilding. It’s just, warts and all, a pretty good character study with a terrific lead performance.
So as you can probably tell, critical consensus is fairly hard to come by on this one. The Rhythm Section is clearly not perfect and it really comes down to whether you think the strength of the action and Blake Lively's performance outweighs the weaknesses of script and story.
If you're a Blake Lively fan or a fan of the books it's a must. Otherwise it's probably 50/50. Right now The Rhythm Section sits at 48% on Rotten Tomatoes based on 25 reviews. Then again, over a decade ago another January revenge film received a rotten score and it wound up being a fan favorite. We'll see starting this weekend if The Rhythm Section can pull a Taken and kick off a franchise.
The Rhythm Section hits theaters on January 31. Check out our 2020 Release Schedule to keep track of all this year's biggest movies and for the latest entertainment news, stay tuned to CinemaBlend.