Single-Player Experiences Have To Go Away, Says Crytek

By William Usher 3 years ago discussion comments
fb share tweet share
“Boo to single-player”, “Single-player is evil”, “No more single-player”. That's pretty much the common theme circulating around a lot of top tier studios in the video game industry right now. Taking the offline, single-player experience away from gamers is somehow a good thing, and Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli believes that the notion of the single-player experience has to go away.

In a lengthy piece by IGN [via Destructoid], complete with an exclusive promo video, Yerli states that...
“I think the notion of a single-player experience has to go away,” … “However, I’m not saying that there will be no single-player experiences ... it could be it’s called Connected Single-Player or Online Single-Player instead.”

Oh, Mr. mean to say that we need more Diablo 3 scenarios? Perhaps he's referring to the newest SimCity?

The main problem is that I don't understand this whole Big Brother approach to single-player games. Does forcing consumers to “stay connected” really benefit them? And how?

I always imagine that people who want to play multiplayer games will play a multiplayer game, and people who want to play alone, offline, should be able to play alone and offline.

Coupling this frame of thinking with Cliffy B's pro-corporate, Gordon Gekko's “greed is good” rant, I imagine most gamers who would just rather play a good game will probably have to bypass all AAA titles and stick with the indie scene.

Yerli's comments are in relation to Crytek's promotion of their free-to-play FPS, Warface. It's one of the many microtransaction games coming out from AAA publishers trying to cash-in on the freemium model. You can check out the entire article over at IGN.
Subscribe To Topics You're Interested In
Blended From Around The Web
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to top

Hot Topics