Judging from Superman Returns’ box office receipts, America has had enough of Superman. While the hero does fantastic business overseas, he’s stuck settling for barely profitable here in the US. So maybe now’s not the time for a George Reeves biopic. Fortunately, that’s not what Hollywoodland is. At least not entirely. Instead, it’s a murder mystery that explores the TV Superman’s untimely demise from two completely separate perspectives, wrapped in two distinctly different stories told in parallel within the one movie.
In the first, the film tells the story of Reeves’ (Ben Affleck) rise to pseudo-stardom in the 50s and then his subsequent struggle to find without his Superman cape. It’s the story of a man living two different lives, a public one where he happily embraced his Superman persona, and a private one where he was completely miserable.
In the film’s second storyline, hard boiled private-eye Louis Simo (Adrien Brody) investigates George Reeves’ death. At first he does so at the behest of Reeves’ mother, later he does it for himself. The police believe the case to be an open and shut suicide; Simo tackles it as a possible murder, working the national news media to force the cops into re-opening their files.
Hollywoodland’s first story moves towards Reeves’ demise, working forward while the second works backward from his point of death to figure out how he died. Brody’s Simo deconstructs Reeves’ life by creating likely scenarios that point towards murder while Affleck’s understated portrayal builds Reeves as a man with unfulfilled hopes and dreams. Suffering personal and private disappointment he’s unhappy, discontented, and he seems like a guy who just might have offed himself.
After a busy career in television this is Allen Coulter’s first stab at directing a significant feature film, and while his picture doesn’t ooze with big screen visual flair, it’s dripping with steady self-assuredness. Where others might try to weave these two separate stories together, Coulter is confident enough to put them directly at odds with one another. Simo’s version of what he believes to be the truth bears little resemblance to the life we watch playing out on screen. As he fights to uncover a conspiracy, we’re watching a charming, funny, sometimes sad man going through the motions of life with an air of almost inevitability. In doing so, Coulter doesn’t solve of Reeves’ death, but he does explore every little nook and cranny of his mystery.
Brody and Affleck split the film’s screen time almost 50-50, though they don’t spend their time together. Adrien is a scene stealer as the weasely, media whoring Simo while Affleck is more subdued as Reeves. Both men fight their private demons. For Simo it’s a tumultuous home life, for Reeves it’s his constant battle for recognition and independence. If there’s any intersection between the stories told in the film, it’s in these men, suffering in their own way and looking for answers to life’s problems. By the end of the film you’ll feel like you really understand Reeves, but Simo remains something of a puzzle. When Reeves’ mother stops paying, why does he keep investigating? Is it because he loves the publicity, or is it because he, like so many, simply refused to believe Superman could shoot himself in the head? Ultimately, figuring out Louis Simo proves as invigorating as uncovering the mystery of George Reeves’ life.
Hollywoodland is one of the most complex, original, based on a true story movies of the year. By avoiding the usual pitfalls of other straight biopics and turning Reeves’ life into a multi-layered, gumshoe murder mystery, it achieves something altogether unique. Coulter’s compelling film is thick with intrigue and full of energy as it plows headlong into a heavy exploration of fame and failure in Hollywood.
Note: This website is not intended for use by minors. The views expressed in this comments section are not necessarily our own. Comments that we deem to be poorly worded, off topic, or threatening will not be published. For free, uncensored discussion visit our forum.
One thing... not one mention of leading lady Diane Lane. Why?
I've heard that she is also very good in this.
For other people who want to know more about Diane Lane's role. She plays Toni Mannix (who is the adulteress wife of Eddie Mannix). She has a passionate affair with George Reeves that COULD be responsible for his death. Lane has quite a big part despite Josh overlooking her.
In defense of Josh's failure to mention Lane, sometimes one must pass over certain aspects in a review to avoid the dreaded 800 word review that no one reads. Sacrifices must sometimes be made.
I just got home from the movie it was absolutely horrible. It was good right up until he got beaten up with the chain and he's found unconscious. After that it was like whoever wrote the script went out and got baked or something. It just dragged on. It was so horrible. I seen 3 people asleep and I dont think it was because it was a 9 30 showing. I never seen a theater clear out so fast in my life. I wont the tickets from a radio station so it was free. and i still feel like I was ripped off. Absolutely terrible.
I agree with Brandon's take on this movie. Firstly, it dragged on a fair bit towards the latter half of the movie. My girlfriend fell asleep not long into the movie and others around us were as well. The subject matter certainly could have been presented different given the various ways of approaching it but really it felt like the movie didn't go anywhere at all. There were a lot of scenes that didn't even seem to be of any relevance to the overall plot or story at all. Thankfully the movie wasn't on my dime since the tickets were from the local paper and it was an advanced showing. Dreadfully horrible movie. Go see L.A. Confidential instead!
all you guys saying this film was even a little good are idiots. this film absolutely made no sense, i didn't even get the story and there were like 3 people in the cinema (me, my friend and his sis) but none of understood anything, so we ended up throwin pop corn and stuff around and running between the rows because the film sucked a big time. if anyone ever says this film is good he's an idiot. the film i saw the day before (hannibal rising) was really exciting, unlike this. it's like a film from 1960 made for people in their late 40's.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
August 9th, 2006 at 16:07
Great review Josh. Thank you!
One thing... not one mention of leading lady Diane Lane. Why?
I've heard that she is also very good in this.
For other people who want to know more about Diane Lane's role. She plays Toni Mannix (who is the adulteress wife of Eddie Mannix). She has a passionate affair with George Reeves that COULD be responsible for his death. Lane has quite a big part despite Josh overlooking her.
Thanks.