Star Ratings

Here we thought Roger Ebert came up with the concept of star ratings for movies (later replacing it with a simple thumb pointing up or down). As it turns out, the concept of using stars to grade or rate items dates all the way back to 1844, when Murray's Handbooks for Travellers modified an old structure using exclamation points to rate items for stars. Since then, stars have been applied to everything from books to restaurants, hotels to theater programs. And at CinemaBlend, we use them to grade movies, television, games and more.

But what do our star ratings mean? Why do we give them? And what information can you take from them? Here, then, is a breakdown of what we are thinking when we apply a star rating to a movie, TV show, video game, and beyond:

5 stars

Pure perfection. It doesn't get any better than this.

4.5 stars

So great. Really special. Short of a masterpiece, but better than most things out there.

4 stars

We enjoyed it. You probably will, too. Some things bugged us, but overall, it succeeded.

3.5 stars

Staying positive. It worked more than it didn't, and every once in a while, something in there really knocked us off our feet.

3 stars

Recommended, but barely. This was good, but not nearly as good as it could have been.

2.5 stars

A mixed bag. The pros and the cons are pretty much neck and neck.

2 stars

A disappointment. We spent most of our time wondering what went wrong. Stay away.

1.5 stars

A disaster. Barely anything works here. Avoid at all costs.

1 star

The worst thing we've seen. Not redeemable on any level. Forget this even exists.

Blended From Around The Web

Hot Topics

Top Movies

Features

Gateway Blend ©copyright 2017