OK, I am not amused. The stresses and strains of
working life meant I couldn't do this as often as I'd like. Though...
truthfully, I admit it's not entirely work to blame, it has been a bit of
my own apathy which I am guilty of in all my ventures. I have a naturally lazy
streak that is the bane of my life. But inspired by recent events I
must come out of my black hole and ensure trailer trash becomes
the regular column I wanted it to be and the regular column you should expect,
considering that two other guys on this site with equally as demanding personal
lives manage much funnier and much more in depth columns every week it seems a
little unreasonable to think I can't do the same...
So it has come to my attention that another site
has plaguerised us. Just as The Film Habit's letters section was a ground-breaking new
idea in a world full of stagnant editorials, so I like to believe that
a whole column dedicated to reviewing and showing you the latest teasers
and tempters from the Hollywood machine every week or so was another
innovation from the world of Cinema Blend. But it seems that rather than try
and compete with Josh's unrivalled acerbic wit, they have seen fit to
try and wrestle my baby from me instead, like Michael Jackson in a
kindergarten.
What's really
insulting is not so much that they have stolen the concept but the name
too.
I know people read the old Trailer Trash columns, even though I haven't
kept them up to date. Even old ones I ran on the forums, with the original
teaser for AVP are still read by guests on the forums to this day. So it irks me
that some other dude can't even be bothered to think up his own name. Some might
claim I'm making a fuss over nothing, that it isn't a particularily original or
clever name to begin with, but of all the sites I have visited I have never
encountered another column or name similar until now.
Cinema Blend's Trailer Trash, the ORIGINAL and BEST trailer
review column, brought to you with annoying irregularity
since March 2004. Remember that as I try and throw off that lazy
streak and make good on that Cinema Blend New Year's Resolution to make this the
third best regular column on this site.
But what the hell, competition's good it may inspire me.
So throwing aside my hissy-fit tantrum of some whipper-snapper trying to
steal my thunder, let's get down to business. I'll mix some old with new this
week, just to make up for my absence.
War Of The Worlds (Spielberg) Released: 29th June 2005
If you were one of the lucky ones,
you got a peek at the Superbowl spot for War of the Worlds
earlier this week. If you're not a raging internet geek, you're
probably quite content to wait to see it tonight. Many people were disappointed, and
to be fair I can easily understand why. While many of us sat back and
admired the pretty pictures of that overpass getting toppled like a cheap
poker table, others quite justifiably said "What's the deal?". While seeing some actual footage of
the movie is nice, it has to be said that the original teaser featuring
the small village getting annhialated was much more satisfying. And after the WotW PR
machine shafted supposedly "lucky" websites by in favour of a deal with
Yahoo Movies, the producers over at Dreamworks really should remember
which guys butter their pre-release-hype bread these days.
War Of The Worlds (Hines) Released:
30th March 2005 (Tentative - No distributor)
Timothy Hines. Oh my. Where to
begin. He's Uwe Boll without the marketing savvy. That about covers it. He
funds his own godawful-looking movies and then occasionally Troma will pick them
up for distribution. Point in case, his previous two movies Chrome and
Starship Orpheus have been "coming soon" now for several years, despite being
complete. Perhaps if his Press Releases spent more time promoting his movies
instead of bitching about all the famous people who refuse to be part of his
projects he might get somewhere. On reflection, maybe not.
Anyway, his
"faithful" adaptation of the H.G. Wells novel has been in production for about 5
years now, suffering a major setback after 9/11 caused whole sections
of already filmed material to be scrapped, apparently. Though I still
don't understand how. Maybe that was a convenient excuse for "ran out of money".
Judging by this trailer what you're going to get is lots of Victorian englishmen
with american accents, trailing across prarieland that looks nothing like
english countryside while enduring effects that look straight out of a cutscene
from a 1994 PC game. Steven's quaking in his boots, I'm sure.
Aaah, the movie so nice, they filmed it twice. Yes, God
knows what possessed former horror maestro Wes Craven but after
completing work on Cursed, he binned the whole thing and started again.
Then in a typically cynical move these days, all the gore was cut out so
it could get a PG-13 rating. PG-13 horror exists for two reasons and two reasons only. To allow
kids in
the doors to boost typically
weak box office returns. And to allow them
to double and triple dip with endless extended and unrated editions on DVD. As a horror fan I'm sick of this treatment. As Yoda and Miyagi both said; "Do, or do not.". PG-13 horror is an oxymoron and deserves nothing but contempt.
I'll admit it.
I watched Alone in the Dark last night. Luckily I had the sense to do
it without contributing money to Uwe Boll's quest to undermine good
film-making. I had already seen and reviewed House of the Dead. I had
hoped it was a cinematic blip. An anomily. I was wrong. Someone in the depths of
Lions Gate was subjected to Boll's bizarre Jedi Mind Tricks that he obviously
uses on his investors, granting him a distribution deal on what I can only agree
with Rafe is the single worst travesty of film ever created. House of the
Dead was awful, but at least
there was some shaky sense of coherence and plot, no matter how awfully it was
presented.
But the fact is, amongst all the
bad practical film-making which also plagues Alone in the Dark, is the
fact that nothing, absolutely nothing, in the movie makes sense. I agree with
every critic who pointed out that Christian Slater's po-faced line of "What is
going on here? No, I mean, what is going on here?" is the most
hilarious piece of cinematic irony every presented. Hopefully the dire box
office performance and critical savaging will result in Ben Kingsley and Michael
Madsen being spared public shame. Hopefully nobody, after this, will distribute
and therefore subject the world to Bloodrayne, his next bastardisation
of a video game. Hopefully, no-one will have to wander blindly into a
Boll torture session because nothing
else is playing that evening ever again. I can only hope...
Digits or Roman numerals are too
cliche for The Ring franchise, so they choose the Queen's English
instead for their sequel. I was never a big fan of The
Ring. Remakes of oriental horror movies are a bad idea simply due
to the fact that many of them are so rooted in oriental culture which is wildly
different to the way the west works. Sure The Ring is probably the best
of the remakes to emerge but the fact was, for all it's attempt at an extended
more concise backstory, it felt neutered, empty and just plain UNSCARY,
especially their take of the one terrifying scene in the original which was
reduced to a special-effects show. Anyway, The Ring Two has brought in
the maker of the original japanese Ringu to direct
the sequel which means we have someone a little more interested in scares than in Pirates taking us through it this time round.
Bruce Willis is... The Negotiator! No wait, that was Kevin Spacey. Bruce
seems to have finally left his toupee'd days behind him and is finally embracing
the polished cue ball look. Hostage looks much like The
Negotiator if John McClane went into hostage negotiation after his run-in
with Simon Gruber. It looks like a lot of fun, I suggest you check it
out.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.