Looking back at the Halloween of my youth, I know there was candy I looked forward to seeing in my trick-or-treat bag every year. I’m talking about candy that only showed up at Halloween time, or didn’t taste as sweet the rest of the year when it wasn’t in a convenient trick-or-treat size. Sadly, as an adult, I’ve started to discover that the candy of my memory isn’t actually all that great as all.
Even more sadly, I’ve started to realize the same thing about the trick-or-treat movie offering at Halloween time: Saw. For five years now, Saw has terrorized audiences with an annual update in the story of the Jigsaw killer and his victims, morally corrupt people who the killer traps in elaborate creations devised to rehabilitate or execute the intended prey. This year’s offering, however, just doesn’t live up to the enjoyment I remember getting out of the previous chapters.
Like its predecessors, Saw V, begins with a bang, killing one of Jigsaw’s victims in one of his elaborate traps, although there is one major difference. This time, the victim of the trap does what is required to free himself from the trap, mashing his own hands into a crippled state. But the trap doesn’t stop. The victim is still executed, and the message is made clear - this isn’t the same Jigsaw killer we’ve been exposed to in previous years. And why should it be? The real Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) was killed two movies ago, and while Saw IV managed to tell a pretty good story despite an absentee villain, Saw V doesn’t do quite as well.
Each chapter of the franchise has pulled back the curtain a little further, exposing more about the Jigsaw killer, even giving a pretty good backstory on Tobin Bell’s character with the last movie. With the initial killer pretty much fully explored at this point, however, it’s time for some new blood. The story inserts Detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor), the only surviving character from the previous chapters, into the role of yet another of Jigsaw’s aids. That’s right - the one remaining cop was playing for the other side all along. In order to prove this too us, the movie begins to show a revisionist history of the previous storylines that doesn’t gel very well and feels more like it’s cheating the stories of all of the movies instead of developing something new.
On top of that, the whole thing just isn’t presented very well. In the past I’ve only caught every other Saw movie, and still had no trouble following the overall story arc. Even though I’ve seen Saw IV, I had trouble figuring out just how Saw V tied into the franchise through a lot of the movie. Admittedly, it’s been a year since I’ve seen the previous chapter, but considering two years and a whole added chapter had occurred between Saw II and IV and I had no trouble following the story then, why does Saw V feel like a piece of a completely different jigsaw puzzle?
Even worse a problem is that not only does the story of Saw V not mesh well with the previous chapters, but it doesn’t even work well within itself. The movie returns to the proven formula of a group of people trapped inside a series of rooms, each with one of Jigsaw’s traps designed to play off their weaknesses. As the people proceed (and die) inside, outside of the chamber the police and FBI go through a vigorous hunt. Only this time, the two storylines are completely unrelated. Nobody is searching for the missing people, nor are they really tied to the other characters outside of the chamber. Hell, nobody even seems to know the five would-be victims are even missing. The ongoing investigation in the outside world is about Hoffman, not about any missing persons. The separate stories barely even intersect, and never manage to form a cohesive story for the movie as a whole.
Leaving Saw V, I couldn’t help but think that maybe the Saw franchise has run its course, and is now out of decent ideas of where to go with the story. Between the revisionist history, the disconnected storylines, and traps that really don’t feel up to the same disturbed creative level of the previous chapters, Saw V is a disappointing Halloween treat. Either that, or it’s that same adult reminder that the candy of years past was never as good as we thought it was when we first enjoyed it.
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
Wow. Once again, I find yet another review where the reviewer trashes the Saw film. Does anyone out there leave a possitive review? And a lot of the time, the person complains about thigngs that are explained in the film, hinting that maybe they didn't pay attention.
Rafe, before you comment on Saw V, make sure you watch I-IV, and pay full attention to all the details. Saw V does an excellent job of tying most of the series together. It explains how the Saw IV twist is possible, and in a very well-thought out way. V explains details about the traps from various parts of the series to explain nto only Hoffman's story as an apprentice, but to explain the details behind the traps. The group traps were really clever, where Jigsaw says one thing but really means the opposite, and the people work to get through the games and figure out the truth behind the games. The police in the second story aren't looking for the people in the traps because no one has called in saying those people are missing. Remember how they are revealed to be connected. It makes sense that no one has realized they are missing. And if you paid attention during the entirety of the film, there's a scene which explains more about hwo the group traps tie into the story. Jigsaw himself explains why those traps take place. And in the end, the traps help Hoffman because when Erickson discovers the survivors, he becomes distracted and tries to help them. Those traps serve as a diversion for the police. Instead of trying to catch the "unknown" apprentice, they instead notice the survivors and become more interested in helping them. Plus, the producers said some of the new characters will return in VI. So those survivors may return, and their rellevance in the series explained more fully.
Watch all the films, then pay attention to the details. You'll be more satisfied with what you see. then you can leave reviews, because you'll have a much better understanding.
Either my comment is being censored or I'm going crazy. I sent an e-mail ranting about this review and it's not on here, regardless that I sent it 3 days ago. I literally said that Rafe should watch the entire series before posting a review. This is unfare, and you guys should be ashamed of censoring comments. If you're going to do it again, have the deceny to send me an e-mail and tell me why =P
I watched Saw V over the weekend and thought it was excellent. Very gripping and tied up a lot of loose ends. My only complaint is that the two police officers looked too alike, if it wasn't for the bandage on one I would have got them muddled up.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
November 30, 2008 at 01:28
October 30, 2008 at 18:52
October 28, 2008 at 10:35
October 27, 2008 at 04:23
October 26, 2008 at 21:55