Back in the early years of their respective careers, Ben Affleck and Matt Damon were basically tied at the hip, not only regularly appearing in films together, but even winning an Oscar for a script they co-wrote. One project that they didn't see eye-to-eye on in the early aughts, however, was the 2003 blockbuster about the Marvel Comics hero Daredevil. While Affleck wound up taking the superhero part, that didn't happen until after Damon actually turned the role down.
Matt Damon has been all over the place recently promoting his titular role in director Paul Greengrass' Jason Bourne, and part of that tour included a sit down with critic Peter Travers. The interviewer brought up the relationship between Affleck and Matt Damon, noting that he had talked to the Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice star earlier in the year and that he had mocked Damon for missing out on Daredevil. The Oscar winner then turned the tables on his friend, however, and revealed that he didn't miss out on anything when it came to the film about the Man Without Fear:
Peter Travers pressed for more information, particularly looking for an explanation as to why Matt Damon turned down Daredevil while Ben Affleck chose to accept it:
You can watch Matt Damon talk about turning down Daredevil in the video below:
While director Mark Steven Johnson's Daredevil was a modest box office success when it was released in 2003, making nearly $180 million on a reported $78 million budget, it's still considered by most to not be one of the comic book movie genre's finest hours. As a result, Matt Damon definitely looks like the smarter actor in this scenario -- but it's not as though the project killed Ben Affleck's career (or even stopped him from playing other superheroes).
Do you think Daredevil would have been any better with Matt Damon in the lead role instead of Ben Affleck? Feel free to discuss it at length in the comments section below, and then perhaps watch a couple episodes of the fantastic Daredevil series over on Netflix.