The historical accuracy of Vikings is a rather consistent topic of conversation among viewers. The History Channel series is a combination of myth, legend, and history, which has led to blurry lines on all fronts. Thankfully, Vikings’ creator, Michael Hirst, has addressed the concerns surrounding the show’s accuracy.
When it comes to Vikings, for every King Alfred (a historically existent character), there has been a less factual one (Athelstan). The latter has been presented as the biological father of King Alfred on Vikings. All of this debate over historical accuracy might not have gotten the attention that it has over the years if the show was not as popular as it is.
The show is a huge hit, though. Hence, Vikings’ creator has weighed in on it, and it is not the only time. Michael Hirst has elaborated on how real history has informed Vikings’ progression. Asked about writing a show where there is little historical information to go on as compared to Hirst’s previous hit The Tudors, Hirst told History Extra:
That is why you do not make comparisons between Vikings and Game of Thrones, even if it can be an easy thing to do. While Vikings does not have unreal things like dragons and, therefore, Dragonfire, it does feature similar cutthroat machinations amidst a world chock of grey-area characters. After all, Game of Thrones has its own historical inspirations too.
As for Vikings, the goal, according to Michael Hirst, is not for Vikings to ring with absolute historical truth. Rather, Vikings’ creator focused on what could be considered “plausible” (within the realm of possibility) while creating the show. Michael Hirst has readily admitted that he cannot always say Vikings is accurate, although, he countered that no one knows the absolute truth for sure.
So, if you are hoping to crack open a history book to learn what will happen after that significant cliffhanger in Season 6A, you are arguably out of luck. Both Bjorn and Harald’s fates were hanging in the balance when Vikings left off. What is known of the real Harald’s history informs curious minds that he lived to be in his eighties.
However, Vikings took a big swing in another direction during the finale with Harald appearing to have met his end. Will Vikings stay true to known history and have Harald survive despite his seemingly mortal wound? If Michael Hirst remains true what he is saying here, it would not be “plausible” for Harald to have died at this point in his life. As for Bjorn, he is in bad shape too. What bearing history will have on seeing either character survive will be interesting to learn. There is a historical basis to have Harald escape death.
Bjorn has two wives pulling for him to make it, so we shall all see what lies ahead for Ragnar’s eldest son. A premiere date for the second part of Vikings’ final season has not been set yet by the History Channel. Until the historical drama returns, check out this summer’s premieres to keep yourself entertained.
Like a contented Hallmark movie character, Britt happily lives in the same city she grew up in. Along with movies and television, she is passionate about competitive figure skating. She has been writing about entertainment for 5 years, and as you may suspect, still finds it as entertaining to do as when she began.
Your Daily Blend of Entertainment News
Thank you for signing up to CinemaBlend. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.