Leave a Comment

Eddie Redmayne in Newt Scamander in Fantastic Beasts

Alright, so the Harry Potter series is a tough act to follow. Something has to, right? There’s just no way the franchise would end then and there after the movie adaptations of J.K. Rowling's success became a cultural staple. Thus 2016’s Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them kicked off a new era of Wizarding World movies. It's since been followed up by 2018 sequel Crimes of Grindelwald and the third of five planned movies is set to begin filming shortly.

But over the years, the Fantastic Beasts movies have proved to be a divisive addition to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter. There are a number of fans who have some major issues with the direction the series of films has gone down so far. This is without the mention of the various controversies that have surrounded the author in recent weeks and casting controversies for Johnny Depp’s Grindelwald and Claudia Kim’s Nagini. Let’s talk through what some Harry Potter fans are not fond of about Fantastic Beasts:

Eddie Redmayne as Newt Scamander in Fantastic Beasts

Newt Scamander Is A Great Character But He Is Being Sidelined

One of the central problems Fantastic Beasts has been criticized for is how it handles its protagonist… or lack thereof. Yes, Eddie Redmayne’s Newt Scamander is the face of the franchise but by the end of the second film, it doesn’t particularly feel like the storyline is about him at all. Fans love how compelling Newt is, especially because he is an unlikely hero who subverts male masculinity and is on the autism spectrum. Many fans are concerned about this protagonist problem. As one columnist explains:

Newt is so underutilized here that it feels like he’s hardly the protagonist anymore…Future Fantastic Beast movies need to remember that Newt Scamander is the heart and soul of the franchise. At the core of its burgeoning lore and great world building, the Potterverse is held up by its characters. Newt may not be the Chosen One here, but he’s the hero the wizarding world needs (and deserves). So yeah, just give us more Newt Scamander, please. And perhaps less of Nicolas Flamel, who is truly pointless in the film.

The first movie focused on the sweet Hufflepuff as he protects his beasts, but the second movie is placing him in the background. Producer David Heyman even told us Newt probably won’t be at “the heart of all of them.” The focus is shifting to Credence and Grindelwald. Fans are upset:

This is certainly a valid concern for fans to have. It does feel as if the first film introduced an exciting character in terms of Newt’s gentle motives to save beasts of the wizarding world. Going forward, the franchise doesn’t seem to be living up to the title. The franchise is instead moving over to focus on the famed duel between Grindelwald and Dumbledore. The quote from Heyman is particularly concerning to me because a franchise needs focus to succeed. Fans care about Newt Scamander and attention is being shifted elsewhere.

Jude Law and Johnny Depp in Fantastic Beasts: Crimes of Grindelwald

There’s A Dumbledore And Grindelwald Problem

Speaking of the relationship between Grindelwald and Dumbledore the Fantastic Beasts movies are expected to delve into during the span of the franchise, fans have a problem with this too. Back in 2007, J.K. Rowling revealed she “always thought of Dumbledore as gay” and disclosed that he “fell in love” with a bad wizard named Grindelwald. Years later when it was announced Grindelwald and Dumbledore were confirmed to be sharing the screen in 2018’s Crimes of Grindelwald fans expected the story would then explore this relationship between them. But when the movie came out, their storyline was not given an ounce of romance and glossed over.

Months after the release of Crimes of Grindelwald, J.K. Rowling went on to explain their “incredibly intense,” “passionate… love relationship.” She went on to explain how uninterested she is to explore the sexual side of their relationship because “One never knows really what the other person is feeling. You can't know. You can believe you know.” In other words, fans are just supposed to read between the lines here. This has sparked heavy discourse within the Harry Potter fandom. Check out these Twitter responses:

Rowling’s relation with inclusivity has since been amplified after her viral comments on the transgender community. That aside, there is credible reason for fans to be worried about how this aspect of the franchise is handled. Now, its understandable that Fantastic Beasts would not heavily lean into the sexual element of the Dumbledore and Grindelwald relationship, but so far it seems like their connection is being placed behind so many closed doors that it may not be a compelling enough story for fans to follow at all. But, we’ll have to see how it pans out. There's more story to tell.

Claudia Kim and Ezra Miller as Nagini and Credence in Fantastic Beasts

Fantastic Beasts Conflicts With The Harry Potter Timeline… A Lot

Now let’s get to perhaps the biggest pet peeve of the Fantastic Beasts franchise to many Harry Potter fans. Despite the films being written by J.K. Rowling herself, there’s a number of glaring continuity errors that have ramifications for the rest of the series. The biggest offender of Rowling’s timeline error is the Credence twist that connected him to the Dumbledores. The long lost brother of Albus was 1) never mentioned and 2) does not match up with mamma Dumbledore’s death in 1899. Fans might let it pass if it was just regarding Credence since it might be a manipulative lie by Grindelwald. But there’s a number of them.

Another example is the cameo of Professor McGonagall at Hogwarts in 1927. The books tell us the Hogwarts professor had been teaching for 39 years as of the ‘90s, so would she have even been born in the ‘20s? Sure it’s just a detail, but it’s troubling fans. As Harry Potter fan site MuggleNet said:

At this point, it seems that the only way to reconcile the contradiction of McGonagall’s appearance in Crimes of Grindelwald with previously established canon is to separate the Harry Potter canon from the Fantastic Beasts canon. However, this concerns me greatly. If Fantastic Beasts isn’t canonically consistent with Harry Potter, then what does that mean for the greater wizarding world lore?

The inconsistencies don’t stop there for the Fantastic Beasts movies. As far as issues go, I think we’re going three for three here as things currently stand. Rowling's consistencies is another legitimate concern. If these movies alienate hardcore fans and confuse casual moviegoers, who exactly are they for?

The series is coming off the lowest reviewed movie set in the Harry Potter world with Crimes of Grindelwald and has some room to grow. Hopefully the franchise can turn itself around on a more exciting course when its third movie comes out. What are your feelings about the Fantastic Beasts movies all things considered? Can you see past these big issues? Vote in our poll below and stay tuned here on CinemaBlend for news on the franchise.

What are your feelings on the Fantastic Beasts movies?
RESULTS
Up Next

Fantastic Beasts: J.K. Rowling Spent 3 Hours Revealing Dumbledore's Secrets To Jude Law

Eddie Redmayne Confirms Fantastic Beasts 3 Filming Has Resumed And Describes The ‘New Normal’ On Set news 2d Eddie Redmayne Confirms Fantastic Beasts 3 Filming Has Resumed And Describes The ‘New Normal’ On Set Katherine Webb
Tom Felton Performed 'You'll Be Back' From Hamilton, And Now I'm Doing All The Fantasy Casting news 4d Tom Felton Performed 'You'll Be Back' From Hamilton, And Now I'm Doing All The Fantasy Casting Mike Reyes
You Can Now Buy Harry Potter's Butterbeer Without Visiting Theme Parks, But There's A Catch news 2w You Can Now Buy Harry Potter's Butterbeer Without Visiting Theme Parks, But There's A Catch Dirk Libbey