At any point in TV's history, which includes both the past and the future, a series about in-hiding Nazis being hunted and killed is going to ruffle some feathers, to say the least. As such, no one's jaws should be hitting the floor when discovering that Amazon's new hyper-violent and darkly comedic drama Hunters is already one of the most polarizing TV shows of 2020 and beyond.
Having released on February 21, Hunters was already causing a critical stir in the days ahead of its premiere thanks to the gaggle of reviews that hit the Internet with the force of Al Pacino's Devil's Advocate speeches (even though Pacino himself barely taps into that manic energy over the course of the first season). The din has only gotten louder in the days since Hunters arrived on Amazon, too.
Let's take a look at the arguments being made for and against Amazon's Hunters across both sides of the aisle.
The People Who Did Not Like Amazon's Hunters
For a quick summary, the '70s-set Hunters follows a diverse group of New York City citizens who discover that hundreds of high-ranking Nazi officers had secretly moved to the U.S. after WWII and began a plan to introduce the Fourth Reich to America. The group, under the tutelage of Al Pacino's Meyer Offerman, sets out to upend the Nazi's grand scheme while eliminating the threat by any means necessary. It's unapologetically confrontational, but also at times seems unsure which genre it's most comfortable playing around in.
The tonal imbalance is on the lighter side of some viewers' complaints. Take this opinion from The Guardian:
Regardless of one's tastes or enjoyment, Hunters is an aggressive meshing of comic book movie standards with 1980s action movie violence and modern horror fetishism. Without getting into spoilers, Hunters' first scene is emblematic of the above critique and others, in that it's a picturesque setting coated in candy colors where smiling faces quickly give way to terror and bloodshed, all while the deliverer or said bloodshed gets a cynical quip or two off.
That sentiment was shared by the review in the New York Times as well.
And this blurb from Forbes' review:
Of course, the larger issue explored in the more negative Hunters pieces has to do with the show's sometimes lax approach to the extremely serious subject matter being discussed and shown. Many had problems with how Hunters handled its approach to Holocaust war crimes and victimizations.
The biggest and most damning piece of criticism came from the official Aushwitz Memorial in Germany, whose representatives shared a scathing post about the Amazon show's pointed inaccuracies. In those words:
Creator David Weil responded to those claims, saying that the human chess game and certain other elements of Hunters were conjured up specifically for the TV show, as he purposefully did not want to depict any of the actual torture techniques that Nazis used on prisoners in the Holocaust.
It doesn't appear that certain viewers' opinions would have been changed by any excuses, though. Take this, from Vox:
Not that everyone flat-out hated Hunters. More than a few viewers have given praise to various elements within the show, but can't quite go all the way forward on recommending it. From The Atlantic:
At only eight episodes, Hunters has obviously proven itself to be worthy of everyone's attention, even if not everyone will want to maintain that focus on the brutality. Let's look at some of the people who did enjoy fixating on the show now.
The People Who Liked Amazon's Hunters
On the flip side of all those dismissals and sometimes back-handed compliments, one will find an equally large section of the viewership heaping praise and adoration onto Hunters. Considering it’s on the same streaming service that gave the world the murderously savage superheroes of The Boys and the Nazi antics of Man in the High Castle, it’s only fitting that Hunters taps into the same enjoyment for viewers who are perfectly fine watching shows where literally everyone is reprehensible in one way or another.
Take this review from Salon, which invokes a name that many reviewers used in both glowing and glowering reviews, Quentin Tarantino.
For those looking for positive-leaning Star Wars comparisons, then the Hindustan Times has you covered.
If Hunters is missing anything, it's probably a scene where Logan Lerman's Jonah takes a Nazi's head off using a lightsaber, and then basketball-tossing it into a trash can via the Force.
By and large, many of Hunters' biggest compliments went to Al Pacino for his role as Jonah's mentor, as well as how heavily the show embraces its B-movie aesthetics. For those already inclined to watch series in Hunters' vein, the shocks and violence were less of an drawback than necessary window dressing.
Similarly to how some of the more negative critiques went, more than a few favorable Hunters reviews also took note of the shortcomings, acknowledging they weren’t sizable enough to skew their opinions completely. Take this one, from Entertainment Voice.
We'll end things on an opinion that, while positive in nature, reads as much like an objective view as anything else aimed at Hunters' first season.
At this point, Amazon has yet to go public with any decisions about Hunters' future, so it's not yet clear whether or not we should start anticipating/dreading the blunt impact that Season 2's arrival will bring.
Nick is a Cajun Country native, and is often asked why he doesn't sound like that's the case. His love for his wife and daughters is almost equaled by his love of gasp-for-breath laughter and gasp-for-breath horror. A lifetime spent in the vicinity of a television screen led to his current dream job, as well as his knowledge of too many TV themes and ad jingles.
Your Daily Blend of Entertainment News
Thank you for signing up to CinemaBlend. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.