|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cloverfield - Review
Length: 84 min Rated: PG-13 Distributor: Paramount Pictures Release Date: 2008-01-18 Starring: Michael Stahl-David, Odet Jasmin, Mike Vogel, Lizzy Kaplan
Directed by Matt Reeves
Produced by JJ Abrams (exec producer)
Written by Drew Goddard
Visit the movie's Official Site!
It’s filmed from the point of view of a single cameraman, who has the rather convenient nickname of “Hud”. Hud is almost never seen in the movie, but, oddly enough, he’s the only likable character in this mess. The people we do see are his friends, whom he starts out filming at a going away party for his best buddy, and ends up following through the streets of New York as the whole world goes to hell around them. His friends are a bunch of annoying, pretty boy hipsters with all the personality of a tongue depressor. You know the type: sexily stubbled, wealthy twenty-somethings who six months ago were probably sleeping on the floor of a frat house somewhere living off daddy’s money and who have now graduated college to move into trendy, Central Park apartments where they’ll take their place in the world as either corporate CEO’s or brilliantly troubled, babe-magnet musicians. I’m just guessing about these people from their clothes here, the movie never actually goes that much into depth about any of the people we’re left following, which doesn’t exactly help the problem. Because once the plot gets rolling, our characters start behaving pretty stupidly. Our head hipster in charge (let’s call him the HIC) starts making a bunch of incredibly stupid decisions, the kinds of choices people usually only make in movies. Worse HIC's friends follow along with his stupidity, and the results… well let’s just say they aren’t exactly successful. Since we don’t know any of these people, it’s hard to believe in what they’re doing. It feels so Hollywood, which is ridiculous in a movie that’s entire premise is built around the idea of presenting a brutally real reality in an incredibly unreal situation. The monster is unreal, the characters running away from him are not supposed to be. Actually crummy characters aside, there’s another big difference between what Greengrass did in United 93 and what Cloverfield is doing. No, I’m not talking about a thirty-story tall monster. Like I said, the monster isn’t really the point. The big difference is that in United 93 Greengrass knew when to give us a break from the handheld camera gimmick, and spaced his film out with more stable shots of people on the ground in other types of crisis. Cloverfield is all gimmick all the time, it never lets up, and as a result it’s hard to call the film anything other than a mostly entertaining, occasionally irritating, entirely numbing, curiosity. Watching the thing through a shaky cam held by an amateur just isn’t that effective in this context when you’re trying to scare people’s pants off. The movement in Cloverfield is too fast, frenetic, and badly filmed (albeit intentionally). You never get a clear idea of what’s going on for most of the movie’s key moments. In a couple of places you don’t even see the movie’s key moments, because the camera cuts out or a light goes dead and things don’t clear up again until whatever is happening is over. Don’t get me wrong, it’s interesting if you approach it simply as an action movie showing you what it would be like stuck as one of the ants underneath Godzilla’s giant stomping foot, but Cloverfield is clearly trying to be scary and intense, and after awhile that stopped working for me. I needed a break from all the amateur camera work. I guess I prefer movies shot by Spielberg or Tarantino, not my father-in-law waving around his camcorder on vacation. Even though Cloverfield isn’t a monster movie, of course the only question anyone has about it is whether or not they’ll see the monster, and if they do was he worth the wait. You can rest easy there. You’ll see him, and see him clearly. Unfortunately the clearest shot of him comes in one of the movie’s stupidest moments when somehow, a thirty-story monster manages to sneak up on our characters in broad daylight in the middle of a wide-open clearing. Yeah, that’s believable. So you’ll see him, just don’t expect to be floored by tons of sweeping wide shots of the creature terrorizing the city. Don’t worry, he looks nothing like Godzilla… though I can’t help but wish they’d actually used Godzilla. They could have plugged just about any giant monster into it and had it work with this story. Why not Godzilla? At least he has city stomping experience. Having made it this far in my review, you probably now have the impression that I hated this movie, and that’s not really true. It’s a movie with problems which need discussing, but as an entertaining, forgettable little novelty act it generally delivers. As I mentioned earlier I think it does work as a simple exploration of what it might be like to be on the ground when a giant, scary monster attacks, and luckily its short enough that by the time some of its problems start weighing things down it’s already over. As a guy who’s spent a lot of his life watching Godzilla, it’s hard not to have at least a bit of fun watching the world from the perspective of the Japanese businessman who usually gets squashed under Gojira’s foot. If only they’d actually followed around a Japanese businessman instead of this bunch of perfectly gelled twats and their high-heeled girlfriends, the movie might have been a lot better.
Thumbnails Gallery for Cloverfield
     Social Bookmark This Article Blinklist
 Del.icio.us
 Digg
 Furl
 Slashdot
 Facebook
 StumbleUpon
 Yahoo!
 Propeller
Comment on “Cloverfield”Note: This website is not intended for use by minors. The views expressed in this comments section are not necessarily our own. Comments that we deem to be poorly worded, off topic, or threatening will not be published. For free, uncensored discussion visit our forum.
Leave a ReplyMAIN SITE NAVIGATION
HOME l ABOUT US l l SEARCH l MOVIE NEWS l MOVIE REVIEWS l MOVIE PREVIEWS l DVD REVIEWS l DVD NEWS l SOUNDTRACKS l FEATURES DATABASE l TELEVISION l MUSIC l GAMES l CELEBRITY l TECHNOLOGY l RSS 2.0 FEEDS l MESSAGE BOARDS l LIVE CHAT l SYNDICATE US l LINKS | CB STORE | GIANT FREAKIN ROBOT This site is owned and operated by Joshua Tyler. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. All original content, text and graphical, is the intellectual property of Cinema Blend. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously. Made in Webta Labs 
|
|
January 16th, 2008 at 18:27
Listening to the description and putting the opinion aside, I can't wait. I loved Blair and I can't stand all the terror porn out there. Sometimes you'll hear someone saying, the terror was nightmarish, when really it was merely frightening. There is something primal about nightmares that connect us to those ancestors of ours whose nightmares probably came from the same fears of immobility, defenselessness, or being consumed. Our primal fears. This sounds like something I would wake-up from in a sweat.