J.K. Rowling isn't an author to publish a mega-popular series of books and then disappear into a giant Scrooge McDuck pile of money while her fans obsess over unanswered questions and magical mysteries. Between Twitter and her Harry Potter website, the author continues to interact with fans and answer questions about the beloved magical series, some more hard-hitting than others. Harry Potter book spoilers ahead!

What happened to the three-headed dog in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? Why didn't the Basilisk destroy the Harry-hosted Horcrux? And why on Earth did the Muggle-loathing Black family settle down in a Muggle community? These are the three questions J.K. Rowling answered for fans this week on Twitter. Let's take a look at how J.K. Rowling answered them, because they've actually left us with more questions...

Why isn't the Horcrux in Harry destroyed when Harry is bitten by the Basilisk in Chamber of Secrets?
Destroy the host, destroy the Horcrux, right? Eh, it's a bit more complicated than that...

At the end of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Harry faces off with the Basilisk, which manages to sink one of its giant fangs into Harry before it dies. We know for a fact that Basilisk venom is one of the few substances strong enough to destroy a Horcrux. Not only does it destroy the one in Tom Riddle's diary, but Ron and Hermione also use one of the fangs to destroy Helga Hufflepuff's cup. So why wasn't the Horcrux residing in Harry's head destroyed when he was bitten by the Basilisk?

Rowling's answer is simple enough. Harry wasn't destroyed by the Basilisk or its venom. He came very close, but Fawkes' tears healed him, and apparently that helped preserve the Horcrux.

But wait, what about the resurrection stone in the ring? The stone still worked, but the Horcrux was destroyed. Someone actually managed to get that question in before Rowling had to jet...

I feel like this answer might've needed more characters than Twitter allowed, but Rowling seems to have managed to answer it as a two-parter nonetheless. Technically, the stone was cracked irreparably, so that ensures the Horcrux is destroyed. But Dumbledore's super powerful and magically precise, so he'd be able to destroy the pesky Horcrux without rendering the stone useless. If that's not enough -- pure speculation here -- maybe the fact that the stone came from Death itself, adds a bit more durability to its magical properties. That the stone could even be made into a Horcrux in the first place is a bit perplexing, seeing as it was already brimming with intense magical powers. But I'm sure there's an added argument there about Voldemort's own level of power and precision.

But I'm going to throw a followup question out there anyway. Was Harry destroyed irreparably at the end of Deathly Hallows? Because he did die, but he recovered, so I mean, define "irreparably."

There are other questions answered, unrelated to Horcruxes, so let's move on...

Blended From Around The Web



Hot Topics

Cookie Settings
Gateway Blend ©copyright 2018