J.K. Rowling isn't an author to publish a mega-popular series of books and then disappear into a giant Scrooge McDuck pile of money while her fans obsess over unanswered questions and magical mysteries. Between Twitter and her Harry Potter website, the author continues to interact with fans and answer questions about the beloved magical series, some more hard-hitting than others. Harry Potter book spoilers ahead!

What happened to the three-headed dog in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? Why didn't the Basilisk destroy the Harry-hosted Horcrux? And why on Earth did the Muggle-loathing Black family settle down in a Muggle community? These are the three questions J.K. Rowling answered for fans this week on Twitter. Let's take a look at how J.K. Rowling answered them, because they've actually left us with more questions...

Basilisk
Why isn't the Horcrux in Harry destroyed when Harry is bitten by the Basilisk in Chamber of Secrets?
Destroy the host, destroy the Horcrux, right? Eh, it's a bit more complicated than that...

At the end of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Harry faces off with the Basilisk, which manages to sink one of its giant fangs into Harry before it dies. We know for a fact that Basilisk venom is one of the few substances strong enough to destroy a Horcrux. Not only does it destroy the one in Tom Riddle's diary, but Ron and Hermione also use one of the fangs to destroy Helga Hufflepuff's cup. So why wasn't the Horcrux residing in Harry's head destroyed when he was bitten by the Basilisk?

Rowling's answer is simple enough. Harry wasn't destroyed by the Basilisk or its venom. He came very close, but Fawkes' tears healed him, and apparently that helped preserve the Horcrux.

But wait, what about the resurrection stone in the ring? The stone still worked, but the Horcrux was destroyed. Someone actually managed to get that question in before Rowling had to jet...

I feel like this answer might've needed more characters than Twitter allowed, but Rowling seems to have managed to answer it as a two-parter nonetheless. Technically, the stone was cracked irreparably, so that ensures the Horcrux is destroyed. But Dumbledore's super powerful and magically precise, so he'd be able to destroy the pesky Horcrux without rendering the stone useless. If that's not enough -- pure speculation here -- maybe the fact that the stone came from Death itself, adds a bit more durability to its magical properties. That the stone could even be made into a Horcrux in the first place is a bit perplexing, seeing as it was already brimming with intense magical powers. But I'm sure there's an added argument there about Voldemort's own level of power and precision.

But I'm going to throw a followup question out there anyway. Was Harry destroyed irreparably at the end of Deathly Hallows? Because he did die, but he recovered, so I mean, define "irreparably."

There are other questions answered, unrelated to Horcruxes, so let's move on...
grimmauld
Why is the Black family home in a Muggle community?
The Black family isn't exactly known for favoring Muggles. Why is this pure-blood magical family living right in the middle of a Muggle community? Apparently, because they liked the house...

It does seem a bit out of character for a family as intolerant as the Blacks to reside in such close proximity to Muggles. But it's not out of character that they would use (presumed) magical means to take what they wanted from Muggles.

My followup question: What ever happened to Grimmauld Place? The last we saw of it, Harry, Ron and Hermione were fleeing the residence, which had just been exposed to the Death Eaters. Did Harry ever go back there? Is anyone living there now? It'd be great of Rowling provided an update on the Black House at some point (perhaps when Deathly Hallows finally unlocks at Pottermore?)

Moving on to the last question....
Fluffy
What ever happened to Fluffy?
In case you were wondering what ever happened to the three-headed dog that was used to guard the philosopher's stone in the first book...

So, Fluffy went back to Greece, and isn't lurking somewhere in the dark forest. That's comforting to know. But now I'm wondering how a three-headed dog is transported from the U.K. to Greece undetected.

Alas, that's all J.K. Rowling Tweeted for now, so I'll just have to add my curiosity about Fluffy's trip from Hogwarts to Greece to my list of questions related to witch/wizard transportation.

As for J.K. Rowling, she has some interesting things on the horizon, including the anticipated Harry Potter-related feature adaptation of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, and the small screen adaptation of her novel A Casual Vacancy.

SPOILERS | Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Ending, Explained

Blended From Around The Web

 

Related

Hot Topics

Cookie Settings