As a Survivor fan, it's easy to be the backseat driver. We can easily imagine what it would be like to play the game or how host Jeff Probst and his team could possibly make it better after 20 years on the air. A former Survivor contestant, who was closer to the actual driver's spot, has some ideas to change up the game that I am totally here for.
Nick Maiorano, a contestant who played Survivor Kaoh Rong, was asked by EW in their Survivor quarantine questionnaire what one thing he would change about Survivor. Maiorano’s response was a nine-part take-down of how to improve Survivor, and three of those changes aren't half-bad.
The changes suggested range from starting with two games of Survivor at once to advantage scavenger hunts. But, Nick Maiorano's idea to “assign a monetary value to fire tokens and prohibit bequeathing” would definitely shake up the game. Fire tokens came heavily into play last season on Winners at War. They were so powerful, in fact, that contestant Natalie Anderson was able to buy advantages that transported her back into the game and into a final spot. Nick Maiorano wrote,
But, not allowing transfer of fire tokens between Survivor players might be too restrictive. In Winners at War, Tony Vlachos had to hustle to get fire tokens because he was in jeopardy of getting booted from the game. He got the tokens (through impressive mind game tactics) and ended up winning the season. It's these do-or-die moments that often make Survivor so compelling. Perhaps, though, it would encourage more risky moves to attain the fire tokens in the first place.
Another intriguing idea by former player Nick Maiorano was to replace the all-important immunity necklace altogether, saying,
It is hard to imagine Survivor without the individual immunity necklace, as it has single handedly saved many players from certain eliminations and solidified the huge social power of the game. Replacing it with other hidden rewards, like the hidden immunity necklaces, might propel players to feel less safe without a guaranteed option. It's an improbable change to the game, after being a 20-year staple of the show, but that might be the very reason to get rid of it.
This poll is no longer available.
Nick Maiorano also suggested that Survivor should allow finalists to vote. This is another unlikely change to the game because the assumption is that the finalist would, obviously, vote for themselves to win the $1,000,000 prize. Maiorano claimed,
Though this could potentially backfire by the obvious happening, it would be intriguing to see if die-hard Survivor contestants that purport respecting the level of gameplay would truly vote for the deserving winner, even if it weren't them. I mean, imagine Coach making it to the end and being forced to vote between himself and a better player – would he? I don't know, but it would make the final vote read that much more exciting.
With Survivor only now beginning filming of season 41 in Fiji, fans have been left anticipating what twist will come next. Perhaps it's not too late for production to incorporate one of Nick Maiorano's changes.
Freelance writer. Favs: film history, reality TV, astronomy, French fries.
Your Daily Blend of Entertainment News
Thank you for signing up to CinemaBlend. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.