Why Marvel May Start Killing Off Major Heroes In Phase Three
Potential Marvel Spoilers Therein
Marvel Studios has, in some ways, changed the industry with their practice of signing actors to massive multi-picture deals. But theyíve also been burning through those options like crazy: the core group of Avengers signed six film deals, with Chris Evansí appearance in the just-announced Captain America 3 to be his fifth. And after that? Evans has gone on record as wanting to step away from acting for a bit. Meanwhile, The Winter Soldier himself Sebastian Stan recently divulged that he had signed a nine picture deal. Given that the Winter Soldier character doesnít have much of an identity or purpose in the Marvel universe without Captain America, whatís he going to do?
And what about Iron Man? Robert Downey Jr. jumped on that train before Marvel refined their hiring processes, earning as much as possible through massive back-end deals that have made him unaffordable. iron Man 3 was a billion dollar success, but why is no one talking about an Iron Man 4? This hasnít stopped Kevin Feige from pitching a third and fourth annual Marvel offering, which have left people wondering, what will these new movies be? Really, what they should be asking is, what happens to the characters we already know?
Well, thatís simple: they all die.
At the close of the Civil War storyline in the comics, the good Captain is felled by a bullet fired by the villainous Crossbones (who shows up in Captain America: The Winter Soldier) and killed (or "killed" in comics parlance). Itís the Winter Soldier, however, who takes up the mantle of Captain America and serves as the hero for a good amount of time. Why else would Stan be signed for nine movies if he wasnít going to take over for Evans? A third Avengers would be Evansí sixth film, by the way, and itís also the final film Downey Jr. is contractually obligated to appear in for Marvel. Which isÖ ominous?
Also lingering and waiting for a third Avengers? Thanos, who doesnít appear to be the "big bad" of Avengers: Age Of Ultron. In the Infinity Gauntlet saga of the comics, Thanos attains the six Infinity Gems (a handful of which have already been introduced in the movies) and uses them to wield the titular weapon, which he then uses to achieve unquestionable victory, mercilessly slaughtering the Avengers, and basically anyone who stands in his way.
Could this be the conclusion of The Avengers 3?
Because comics donít have to adhere to the bigger-is-better action extravaganza of a blockbuster movie, this is eventually undone, and the heroes are restored to life, as well of the rest of the universe that Thanos improbably slaughtered. A movie probably couldnít get away with that, but a third Avengers is going to have to try awfully hard to present a Thanos that doesnít worship Death so thoroughly that he couldnít end the lives of any who threaten him.
Marvel has a boatload of potential newer properties to launch, like Dr. Strange, Captain Marvel and Black Panther. But by the time we see these, theyíll be competing for attention against Warner Bros.í DC slate, which could include movies like Wonder Woman, The Flash and a new Batman. Ultimately itís no contest: Marvelís C-List characters arenít nearly as popular or well-known as DCís A-and-B Listers. Whatís going to set these companies apart is purpose: the reason movies like Ant-Man have been incubating for years as Marvel figures out what to do is because they arenít just heroes: theyíre reinforcements.
Marvel has The Dark Knight to thank for the obvious element that their superhero universe needed, and that is escalation. Trotting Thor out every year, and simply introducing a bunch of new characters in exactly the same way, was bound to get stale. They need a purpose to assemble, they need something to avenge. When youíve got Hawkeye firing no-look arrows at invading villains, the world doesnít need more superpowers. But whateverís on the horizon for Marvelís characters is going to demand an answer. Itís why Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. has been slowly ratcheting up the stakes with new characters from the canon. Itís why Netflix is going to be putting together the Defenders led by Daredevil and Luke Cage. Cap's got an exit plan and RDJ's got one foot out the door; for Thor, there's always Ragnarok, the cataclysm constantly teased in the comics, where Asgard falls. Everyone has an endgame, and sooner or later, the stakes have to be raised enough that we do see an end for these characters, and not a leading man like Hemsworth who might want to go on and do better things.
The onscreen Marvel universe only dates back to 2008ís Iron Man, though if you believe what youíve heard about Captain America: The Winter Soldier, it seems as if itís already experienced some major losses. Marvel's got a 2017 May release date locked for a mystery movie -- some say that will be a third Avengers. If that marks the end of the road for these characters (and it seems to suggest the end of contracts for at least Downey and Evans, and probably Hemsworth, too), that will mean their continuing Marvel stories will have lasted nine years. A decade of stories could welcome a new batch of Marvel characters. Or it could be a prime opportunity to reboot: just ask Warner Bros., who had 10 years of Harry Potter and are now planning Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them for 2016. Even if Marvel does kill their characters, it ultimately might not be for long.
In other words, the Marvel movies would be following the formula set up by the comics: when things get dull, off someone, pretend itís forever, then re-introduce them when you need another burst of attention. Of course, if they stay dead, the movies will simply resemble the Ultimates line, a semi-plausible rendering of the Marvel universe where, in-continuity, most of the characters have already died horribly. The Ultimates were once considered a template for the movies. If Marvel keeps it up, it might be the other way around.
Back to top
GET US IN YOUR FEED